Tuesday, March 1, 2011

Don't string me up but ...

Big man for smaller government?
Okay, this might destroy my blue bonafides, but I kind of admire this guy. He's tough, plain-spoken and breathlessly un-demagogic. I'm just grateful for every conservative politician who isn't foaming at the mouth about stem cells, reproductive rights, religion or guns. Maybe my standards have been lowered, but we have a history of pragmatic and respected Republican pols in PA -- from John Heinz who was lionized by the common people in Democratic PGH to Arlen Specter to Tom Ridge. We have some flakes too (cough Santorum). Christie is not a flake. He's a straight-ahead fiscal conservative which the folks across the river arguably need right now to prevent fiscal collapse.

Some people slap the "bully" label on him. Christie has stated that he advocates "adversarial collective bargaining," which sounds like tough-guy talk until you realize it is the norm in the private sector. Ed Rendell engaged in it in PHL during his first term as mayor and he is a Dem. folk hero.

As much as I support unions and the right to collective bargaining, nobody says it should be easy. Christie's point that if you're a CEO and it's your money, you negotiate as if it counts, because it does -- it's your bottom line. However negotiating in the public sector means "other people's money" and it is far too easy to give away the candy store with no pain to self and a positive payoff in campaign contributions if you are seen as union-friendly.

We're hemorrhaging here and you can blame the evil bankers and you'd not hear me raise a squawk, but it's we middleclass folk who have to take the brunt of it and make it work. We always do. It sucks, but that doesn't make it less true. Want to have a bonfire and roast some derivatives traders. I'll be there with bells on. But we all suffer from the rich men's greed until we put a stop to it. Different issue.  


Back to Chris Christie and NJ politics. My younger (Republican) brother was the mayor of a small NJ borough. He was elected with impressive numbers after he donated about a year's worth of legal assistance to secure flood relief for the township. Toward the end of his term, he had the temerity to propose that the borough's police and fire merge with the larger borough that surrounded his smaller one. A recent NY Times article talks about this unique situation in NJ, where every little podunk town has its own emergency response system which means a lot of waste and redundancy. In my brother's case, the savings would have been in the millions to the tax base and the good people of his constituency rewarded his prudence by egging his house, leaving threatening messages on his home phone. Needless to say, they tried to recall him while still in office then rode him out on the rails in the next election.

I told him no good deed goes unpunished. I told him about favorable coverage of Christie in the Inky last year. He was genuinely shocked that a "mainstream liberal paper" (not my opinion, mind you) had anything nice to say about the new guv. Unspoken, was that his Democratic older brother would have a similar positive take. 


What we don't get in these polarized times is that the fact based respectful debate between fiscal conservatism and social activism is balanced and necessary. We should help the neediest of our population. And we should be able to pay for it. Nobody should be demonized for taking one side or the other, as long as they're working with facts instead of pandering to emotions.



Make me barf!
I'll tell you, I saw the Time mag cover "Obama (hearts) Reagan" and it made me want to hurl. Reagan was the trendsetter for everything that is wrong about today's Republican party. Ideology over principle. Show without substance. Teflon. Telling people what they want to hear instead of what we need to hear. Reagan trained up a new army of wingnuts who think patriotism means selfishly voting with their wallets and prayerbooks instead of what's good for the entire country. Reagan might as well have been Gordon "Greed is good" Gekko. So what is the best hope for leadership in this country doing embracing a such a demagogue? 
I'd be far happier if O embraced the fleshy, still very much alive Chris Christie. Then we could have a real discussion about what's gone wrong and how to fix it.

One more thing. PA Guv Tom Corbett is talking about emulating Chris Christie. You want to make "smaller government" I say fine. Start with the boondoggle that is Harrisburg where we have more state reps per unit of population than any other state than New Hampshire. If Corbett sent about half of those hillbilly nosepickers back to their one horse towns, even I'd vote for him. PA is proof that more representation is not better representation. See table below:

Population and State Legislative Size

Population  
Legislatures          


 State
 In
 2005
 Population
 Rank
 Total
 Size
 Total
 Rank*
 Senate
 Size
 Senate
 Rank*
 House
 Size
 House
 Rank*
 Alabama
 4,557,808
 23
 140 
 24 
 35
 16
 105
 16
 Alaska
 663,661
 47
 60 
 39 
 20 
 25 
 40 
 30 
 Arizona
 5,939,292
 17
 90
 35
 30
 20
 60
 26
 Arkansas
 2,779,154
 32
 135
 26
 35
 16
 100
 18
 California
 36,132,147
 1
 120
 29
 40
 12
 80
 22
 Colorado
 4,665,177
 22
 100
 34
 35
 16
 65
 25
 Connecticut
 3,510,297
 29
 187
 9
 36
 15
 151
 6
 Delaware
 843,524
 45
 62
 38
 21
 24
 41
 29
 Florida
 17,789,864
 4
 160
 17
 40
 12
 120
 13
 Georgia
 9,072,576
 9
 236
 3
 56
 4
 180
 3
 Hawaii
 1,275,194
 42
 76
 36
 25
 22
 51
 27
 Idaho
 1,429,096
 39
 105
 32
 35
 16
 70
 24
 Illinois
 12,763,371
 5
 177
 13
 59
 3
 118
 14
 Indiana
 6,271,973
 15
 150
 18
 50
 6
 100
 18
 Iowa
 2,966,334
 30
 150
 18
 50
 6
 100
 18
 Kansas
 2,744,687
 33
 165
 16
 40
 12
 125
 10
 Kentucky
 4,173,405
 26
 138
 25
 38
 14
 100
 18
 Louisiana
 4,523,687
 24
 144
 22
 39
 13
 105
 16
 Maine
 1,321,505
 40
 186
 10
 35
 16
 151
 6
 Maryland
 5,600,388
 19
 188
 8
 47
 9
 141
 8
 Massachusetts
 6,398,743
 13
 200
 6
 40
 12
 160
 5
 Michigan
 10,120,860
 8
 148
 20
 38
 14
 110
 15
 Minnesota
 5,132,799
 21
 201
 5
 67
 1
 134
 9
 Mississippi
 2,921,088
 31
 174
 14
 52
 5
 122
 12
 Missouri
 5,800,310
 18
 197
 7
 34
 17
 163
 4
 Montana
 935,670
 44
 150
 18
 50
 6
 100
 18
 Nebraska
 1,758,787
 38
 49
 40
 49
 7
 N/A
 N/A
 Nevada
 2,414,807
 35
 63
 37
 21
 24
 42
 28
 New Hampshire
 1,309,940
 41
 424
 1
 24
 23
 400
 1
 New Jersey
 8,717,925
 10
 120
 29
 40
 12
 80
 22
 New Mexico
 1,928,384
 36
 112
 31
 42
 11
 70
 24
 New York
 19,254,630
 3
 212
 4
 62
 2
 150
 7
 North Carolina
 8,683,242
 11
 170
 15
 50
 6
 120
 13
 North Dakota
 636,677
 48
 141
 23
 47
 9
 94
 21
 Ohio
 11,464,042
 7
 132
 28
 33
 18
 99
 19
 Oklahoma
 3,547,884
 28
 149
 19
 48
 8
 101
 17
 Oregon
 3,641,056
 27
 90
 35
 30
 20
 60
 26
 Pennsylvania
 12,429,616
 6
 253
 2
 50
 6
 203
 2
 Rhode Island
 1,076,189
 43
 113
 30
 38
 14
 75
 23
 South Carolina
 4,255,083
 25
 170
 15
 46
 10
 124
 11
 South Dakota
 775,933
 46
 105
 32
 35
 16
 70
 24
 Tennessee
 5,962,959
 16
 132
 28
 33
 18
 99
 19
 Texas
 22,859,968
 2
 181
 11
 31
 19
 150
 7
 Utah
 2,469,585
 34
 104
 33
 29
 21
 75
 23
 Vermont
 623,050
 49
 180
 12
 30
 20
 150
 7
 Virginia
 7,567,465
 12
 140
 24
 40
 12
 100
 18
 Washington
 6,287,759
 14
 147
 21
 49
 7
 98
 20
 West Virginia
 1,816,856
 37
 134
 27
 34
 17
 100
 18
 Wisconsin
 5,536,201
 20
 132
 28
 33
 18
 99
 19
 Wyoming
 509,294
 50
 90
 35
 30
 20
 60
 26
 TOTAL
296,410,404 

 7,382

 1,971

 5,411

* Due to equal sizes of legislatures or legislative chambers, rankings may not range from 1 to 50.
Source: http://www.ncsl.org/default.aspx?tabid=13527 

No comments:

Post a Comment