Thursday, June 25, 2009

State of the Art--circa 20th Century

If you care about the state of our nation's telecommunications infrastructure or just your own service, you should watch this Charlie Rose interview with Verizon CEO Ivan Seidenberg and then read the comment I posted. If you can't locate my response, it is reprinted below.

I've been following telco history for a while and clearly recall Bell of PA promising in the late 80's to bring fiber to the curb by 1996, not 2001 as Mr. Seidenberg suggests. And while Verizon is tearing up vast trunks of copper laid but never used under Philadelphia's Broad St. (and passing those costs on to consumers), I still can't get FIOS service to my relatively affluent urban neighborhood, a few blocks from the old B of PA HQ. Let's see. What else can't I get?

It's been raining here and the old copper junction box in the middle of my street is a rat's nest of bad splices that go out when the weather gets bad, so until tonight, my high speed internet had been mostly off 5 evenings running. While I could get a Vodafone chip to use overseas on unlocked Moto phones, there's no Verizon tech solution to get those same phones on to the proprietary Verizon network. Seidenberg's assertion that the phone makers pick and choose their networks is a little disingenuous. Telco(network and device) technologies leapfrog over previous iterations and provide jarring rather than smooth upgrade paths. If computer co's followed the same fitful model, can you imagine how few of today's (taken for granted) computing advances we’d have?

Verizon's tech support and trouble ticket resolution is often infuriating if you're a power user and I can only assume even moreso if you're not. Their upselling on FIOS packages confused the heck out of my senior citizen parents resulting in services they didn't need and hefty charges they didn't expect. It bordered on deceptive.

Seidenberg promised to roll out G4 later this year. I'm waiting to see how long it really takes and what I'll have to give up to get it. Like all of the second/third/fourth generation Baby Bell reincarnates this is still a company that only reacts when spurred by what little competition it gets. But since post-divestiture, it remains a quasi-monopoly and is largely unconcerned about competition, its primary business model is driven mostly by amortization schedules of its aging but expensive infrastructure. Consumer clamor for choice, open architecture and state-of-the-art services take a distant third as a business driver. At least in Europe and Asia, government oversight of and investment in their telco monopolies drives innovation that we stateside won't see for years. Telemedicine and other futuristic bandwidth on demand services that Seidenberg was riffing on are concepts that have been around since the 80's. Though their service is fairly reliable, it used to be better.

This not a company on the cusp of the telecommunications revolution, rather it has been dragged kicking and screaming into the 21st century. In this business sector only two things spur innovation—government oversight or true competition. Since Verizon has neither, it is content to stay its uninspired course.

Sunday, June 21, 2009

Father's Day Catch


I've never been a huge fan of this Hallmark holiday, even after I became a father. The boys do cute little handmade things which I have to get creative (clean) to find room for in my tiny office. Mrs. W found a cafe table at Lowes and I have to get creative (clean) our tiny backyard to put it to use. Today's most unexpected catch took up no room, except a bright stray byte snagged by my spam filter.

To wit:

Dear Sir/Madame,

Kindly accept my apology for sending unsolicited mail to you as I sourced your contact from a human resource profile database on your Country. I am writing you hoping that you will lend ears to my honest and sincere request due to the urgent need transfer my inheritance funds abroad for investment purpose.

I am Miss Lois Karia 22 years and the only child of my late parents Mr.and Mrs Donald Karia. My father was a highly reputable Gold and Cocoa magnet who operated in Abidjan ,the economic capital of Cote D' Ivory during his days.It is sad to say that my father passed away mysteriously as a result of poisoning during one of his business outings on 12Th February 2009. Though his sudden death was linked or rather suspected to have been masterminded by an uncle who traveled with him at that time. But God knows the truth. My mother died in 1987 when I was just 2 years old, and since then my father took me so special. My father's second marriage could not stand due to the ill treatment being given to me by the woman. Before his death on February 12 this year he called the secretary and i at his hospital bedside and told him that he has the sum of Ten Million, five hundred thousand United State Dollar(¨$10.500,000) left in fixed/suspense account in one of the leading banks Morocco. He further told that he deposited the money with my name as the next of kin, and finally issued a written instruction to his lawyer who he said is in possession of all the necessary documents of this fund in the bank. I am just a university undergraduate and don't much about financial issues. I need an account oversea were I can transfer this funds and after the transaction i will come over to your country , because I have suffered a lot of set backs as a result of incessant political crisis here in the country. The death of my father actually brought sorrow to my life and i wished to invested under your care please, particularly in the AIR LINE FIELD.

I am in a sincere desire your humble assistant in this regards so that i will leave here and have a settled life which is the wish of my father before his untimely death. Your suggestions and ideas will be highly welcomed but permit me to ask this two questions:-{1} Can you honestly help me on this without betraying me?{2} Can I completely trust you ?Note: While i am offering you 10% of the total money for this important assistance, you will also be the overseer of the investment untill i finish my education here in Morocco. I will give you a reasonable percentage from the total sum for your assistance while I pray that you do not betray me at last. Please it is important you reply me immediately for more details on the next step hence it is my wish to relocate to your country as soon as the transfer is concluded.

I wait to here from you soonest
Yours,

Miss Lois Karia.
Please send your reply to my private email: "misslois_karia@ymail.com">misslois_karia@ymail.com

Creative in the extreme-the most creative I've seen of this genre and even unintentionally funny. With it's Hamlet and Perils of Pauline references, this nuanced and tragic story got a second look from this jaded scrivener. A hit, a very palpable hit. Poor Donald, gold MAGNET that he was, probably wasn't done in by foul play by your evil uncle, but merely hit upside the head by a wayward ingot. And uh, Miss Lois, if you were 2 in 1987, that would make you 25, uh I mean 24, not 22. Either way, sorry for your loss. So here's some free words of advice. You're a creative, with sucky math skills--I can relate. You're right about one thing. You have no business managing $10.5M on your own. Forget your Morrocan education, come to the US and earn an "honest living" as a copywriter. With you to bankroll us, we can start our own full-service agency together. You have the touch and people will pay you to exercise it. Sure, this advice is free, but if you merely want to deposit something in my Morrocan account in gratitude, send me your bank routing numbers, a full-body picture and your social and we'll take it from there. You can trust me on that.

What? There's real creative networking at work here people! A little respect.

Wednesday, June 3, 2009

StepOut Walk to Fight Diabetes



Check out my new StepOut to Fight Diabetes homepage in preparation for the October 3rd, Philadelphia walk from the Art Museum to City Hall and back.
Come join me or make a donation to fight diabetes and raise awareness about all the complications of this epidemic disease.

Click here to make a donation.

Friday, May 1, 2009

Saul Become Paul, To Honor My Father


Saul Become Paul

I am Saul become Paul
Son of Schmul become Sam
Son of sons.
We are lined
At the shores of pain
West Pennsylvania born and bred
Like him
What can we do but rejoice for his freedom
Lazarus son of immigrant parents
Vigorous, compact maror eaters
Used to the cold
And each virtuous breath you take of it.
Nicking the westward wind
Its tang of eastern oceans
Whispers of origins receding
Grown fainter with each turn of the ball.
Yet, sprayed out upon the New World’s sand
He rises, unquenched
Through oceans of air
Through chestnut groves
Down ancient tumbled slatebeds
Where new memories hewn from the hills
Are smelted in the valleys
Black smoke on blue sky
Cloudworks, bellowed breath to praise
Our metal heart running red
Sluiced, cooled, hammered on bare rocks
Become extended fingers
Lifted, gleaming in the sun
They bend at the horizon to encircle
Allegheny waters
Iron brown and mostly slow
They feed all
Who pass beyond the seven hills
Where we, while we, who still stand
Between stones, dig our toes into this temperate green carpet
We who still draw inspiration of cold, honest air
Pledge to return in praise
Of the sad, confusing beauty of transformation
Faithful of blessing
Hopeful of reunion
With all who ever art
Beyond the hills
But ever before us.

rmw © 2009 4/27/2009

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Sen. Arlen Specter will switch parties, run as Democrat in 2010

Election. Defection. Rejection!

When John Heinz was still alive, the Republican Party in PA had two wise, pragmatic leaders in him and Arlen Specter. As a Dem, I voted for both of them without hesitation. In the Senate, Heinz focused on retirement and the elderly, health care, international trade, finance and banking, environmental issues, human development and education. He chaired the National Republican Senatorial Committee (96th and 99th Congresses) and a member of the Senate Special Committee on Aging (97th through 99th Congresses). Does this guy sound like any Republican you've heard of lately? Why he sounds downright pinko liberal. Definitely of another era. Like Specter.

They represented my state and neither ever spouted the reactionary demagoguery that incredibly, is still GOP standard issue. I can't wait to see Rick Santorum's smirking OPED reaction in Thursday's Inquirer. Being the Republican poster boy (ahem, former Republican poster boy) I'm sure he's feverishly pounding out his peevish and consistently irrelevant response to all this "bad" news. Don’t you get it yet? To all young Republicans out there – wishes for a long, long life. My generation will be gone and you’ll be old and gray before you see another GOP centrist or a conservative Republican US President.

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Saul M. Weiss, Semper Fidelis

This is my eulogy for my beloved Dad, who died on April 10th of this year. The original version was shorter and designed to be delivered in a Church, but through mishap, a quirk of fate, honest mistake, whatever, neither I nor my sibs were called up to share our final words to honor our father. Yes, it is possible to screw up a funeral. After the numbness of the day, after the anger had faded, my next thought was to seal my offering in an envelope, take it to a quiet spot in the country, light it up and never look upon it again. I've had a change of heart. In hopes that the dead have infinite bandwidth, I submit this for your approval Pop. Feel free to edit and get back to me.

Saul Weiss, Wednesday, March 9, 1927 – Friday, April 10, 2009

Do not go gentle into that good night. … Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

These lines of Dylan Thomas’s were special to my father because he spoke them at the funeral of my grandmother Esther Colker Weiss and memorialized them on a plaque following those services. A professional lifetime spent in putting a camera on top of microscopes and over the shoulders of doctors and scientists left my father a rational man, a skilled technician, deeply committed and proud of his contribution to the textbooks, slide catalogues, lectures and presentations that physicians use to pass on medical knowledge.

Very much not the type to wear his heart on his sleeve, Saul M Weiss nonetheless had a deep emotional reservoir. We’ve heard and read about his accomplishments, but it’s to this emotional side of Saul Weiss, that I’d like to speak today. The very first time I encountered it was in 1967. Dad stood in the doorway of 4149 Branding Place and he was weeping bitterly over the death of his father, who in these last couple of years, he’d grown to resemble in my eyes. It wasn’t an easy transformation to witness any more than seeing a grown man sobbing, blaming himself for the death of his father. Even at 10 years old, I knew it couldn’t be true, but I was rattled. I’d never heard him talk that way. I had never seen him cry. When he saw my reaction, he called me over, threw a hairy arm over my shoulder, pressed me to his wet scratchy face and said it was okay, that men cry sometimes and there was no shame in it.

Most often Dad’s emotional currents ran lighter, with toleration, optimism and pride, even in the face of injustice. In 1969, the troubles of the turbulent sixties reached inside our old clunker of a family car and touched me directly. There was a racially motivated murder in York, PA. There were race riots in Newark, Watts and Pittsburgh. Dad and I drove through, East Liberty, I think and we saw a National Guardsman at a barricade with a riot gun. He was blockading a street with horrid looking houses in front of which stood parked late model Lincolns and Cadillacs. Each car better than the Ramber Dad was driving. I’m sure the car was older than I was at the time. I asked my father two questions that day.

First, I wanted to know if we were about to have a race war in this country. Whatever personal anxieties that question raised, he turned to me very gently and said he truly believed cooler heads would prevail. It was all I needed to hear. I then asked him how all those people on that street, if they were so poor, could drive Lincolns and Cadillacs, while our car was rust-paneled station wagon that rattled when it stopped or started. He said, “Son, when people are deprived the opportunity to live in decent houses and work at decent jobs, they put whatever dignity they have into their cars.” The eloquence and insight of his responses, the dignity that day, was all his.

I’m still processing these life lessons, when later that summer, we were invited to dinner at the house of Rege Debonis, dad’s boss at Mercy Hospital. Rege and his family are just like us, except that they had a nicer house, nicer car, nicer clothes and they’re black. After a lovely meal, my father driving us home announced proudly that if everybody could sit down and break bread like our two families had, that the racial problems in this country would soon be over. Although Dad lived a life of “intolerance of intolerance”, these two events set and bookended my feelings about race and exhibited the emotional wisdom and tolerance of Saul Weiss.

Dad was such a square-shouldered guy. I never heard him swear worse than the word ‘damn.’ I never heard him use an epithet racial or otherwise, abuse or speak ill of anybody. I never knew him as anything but scrupulously honest and fair in all his dealings. From him and my mother, I’ve received these examples as a gift, the gift of clarity, a clear and unambiguous understanding of what it means to be fair which encompassed everything from how to treat people in business to how children should be raised up. Teach honesty by being honest yourself, even if to a fault. We all know honesty is the best policy, but it isn’t always easy to live with. My mother can tell you that.

When we lived in New Orleans Mom and Dad were invited during Mardi Gras, to the Krewe of Comus Tableau Ball, a grand affair for 3,000 people at the Gaiety Theatre. Young men and women, sons and daughters of New Orleans elite, sashayed past elaborately costumed as swans, pirates, fairies, bowing and curtseying for the admiration of parents and other distinguished spectators. My own parent turned to a distinguished gentleman seated next to him and said, “Y’know, I gave up playing Peter Pan when I was eleven.”

The distinguished gentleman turned to him and snarled, “Suh, that’s mah daughta out thae-uh!”

Trouble is, the fruit doesn’t fall far from the tree.
Trouble is, I got into similar trouble with the last person in the world that you’d want to. That’s right, my own mother. Two weeks ago Mom and I were on our way to visit Dad at the Nursing Home. Not that I’d needed an excuse, but I’d missed another opportunity to attend Sunday Mass doing another one of my late night writing stints. Mother was upset. She asked, “”What’s wrong, don’t you believe in God anymore?”
I said, “Mom, you don’t want to have this conversation with me.”
She said, “Yes I do.”

So we had it.

It wasn’t easy, telling her the truth about what I believe and don’t believe, because at the very least I knew I’d upset her at the very time that the very last thing I’d want to do is upset her.

Mom, though I do dearly love you, I do not believe:
· in a God who is petitionable by prayer.
· that his only begotten Son was born of a Virgin, suffered, died, was buried and rose from the dead to free me from my sins and allow me entry to the gates of heaven that were barred to all men, good or bad, since Adam and Eve who I also don’t believe in.
· Original Sin
· that Communion is anything more than a symbol for the Body and Blood of Christ,
· that the Bible is anything more than good words written by inspired men.
· I don’t believe in Heaven, a God with a gender, a white beard, mercy, love, a son, an army of angels, a temper and all the other anthropomorphicisms humans ascribe to their Gods? Aren’t these all just tales we tell each other in our rather mixed attempts to cherish each other, do good and further the cause of a moral society.
I do believe:
· That prayer might have power, but that that power emanates from those who pray and those who are prayed for.
· You don’t need a church to pray. I pray in my walks about the city, at this keyboard, my spirit worships the beauty of the cosmos, human genius, and the sweet happy faces of children.
· If there is a God, this entity is so far beyond my understanding, as far beyond the daily lives and sins of humans as a car’s backfire is from the Big Bang.
· I am a sinner, but I believe if there is forgiveness or redemption to be had, it’s only from the people I have wronged.
· I’d like to believe in an afterlife, if only because my own ego has a hard time accepting that when I die, that nothing will remain of me but memories. But since nobody has returned to say otherwise, I remain skeptical. All evidence suggests that when I or anybody dies, that we cease to exist.
· In being good. Playing nice with others. Picking my toys up (I’m a little weak on the last one) though I endeavor to be a good man. I think the rest of the spiritual stuff pretty much follows from that.
· That love should be saved for people and the creature that inhabit our world. Deities, if they exist don’t need my love. I invest my love in people, my family and friends, a few cats and the beautiful planet that sustains us all.
· That there is more of “God” in a tree than in a church
· That if there is an omniscient, all powerful Creator, “He” will have to be happy with that.

If “He” isn’t, if “He” is so vindictive and egotistical as to consign me to eternal damnation based on my skepticism alone, how can “He” claim any mercy, omniscience or omnipotence.

Okay, I gave her a much shorter version, but Mom knows more than enough to be praying in earnest for my immortal soul, to which I respond, it never hurts to have good people on your side.

At which point, half the people here are muttering under their breaths jeeze, why didn’t you shut up and just go to church with your mother? What kind of son are you? I am Richard, son of Saul become Paul. Son of Schmul become Sam. I am my father’s son, son of sons and I cannot lie to my mother. I never could.

It was to this very issue, that my father imparted the sagest advice he ever gave me, his profoundest bit of truth, the truth that defines me, the kind of son, brother, family member, friend I am and the kind of father I am. After a particularly intolerant priest denied me a dispensation (recognition of my impending marriage by the Catholic Church) because I wouldn’t subject my wife AND her family to the same hour long personal interrogation I went through, we were in crisis. I agonized over the split this would cause between my devout Catholic family and my soon to be wife and her devout Protestant family.

My wise father took me aside and said, “Son, your mother loves her God, but she loves you, her children more.”

This little diamond blew out all the anxiety and cobwebs. This truth launched my marriage 29 years ago, and it certainly crystallized the mutual admiration society between my lovely Kara and my parents that exists to this very day. For I also know with utter certainty that what Saul said about Rita loving her children most of all applied just as much to him, as to her. This is the kind of love that stands up to God, the devil, the priest, death or all the adversity the world can throw at you and says ‘Honey, don’t worry, I got your back and I always will.’

I know my brothers and sisters have tapped this emotional wisdom in our father. I know this because I’ve seen them all in action. They know. They know that’s what family is. Dependable. That’s what a Weiss is. Honest and fair. That’s who we are. That’s what we do.

Let me tell you of another current that fed the emotional aquifer of Saul Weiss. Dad was always intellectually ravenous and proud of every scrap of knowledge he gained in his life. In spite of or more, because he never finished college, he had a hunger, a fierce passion for learning. He chewed me out royally for my year-long sabbatical from college to “find myself.” He saw it as a lost opportunity. Button-popping proud of his contribution to the knowledge of medical students and doctors, he was equally proud of the knowledge he absorbed in the process. He saw this as more than a double bonus, a sacred and honorable trust. Surrounded in his work by doctors and health care professionals, he soaked in knowledge like a sponge and shared it freely with us.

The lesson of Saul is plain… If you want to know more, surround yourself with people who know more than you, then share. He believed that the value of, the essence of knowledge is that it’s worthless unless shared. Dad shared at home by being a lively debater, a skeptic, a man of strong opinions, a passionate, articulate talker. Always philosophical he was nonetheless earthy, a man as in love with the life of the mind as he was respectful of the humble origins and humble people from whom he sprang.

Perhaps the strangest take on the emotional stuff Saul Weiss was made of comes from a story of how my father approached discipline. I’m not talking about spare the rod spoil the child, ‘it hurts me more than it hurts you’ variety, though we know a little something about that brand of discipline. I’m talking about the much sterner stuff to be found in self-discipline.

Picture, a glorious early summer bright Saturday, I’m maybe my son Bennett’s age and Dad, in a sort of tense, conspiratorial way comes to me and says “I need you to go to work with me.’ Not “Do you want to go?” No. “I need you.” Well I puffed up like a peacock to be considered so indispensible by him. We got in the little yellow Volkswagen he’d just bought, and I think we must have been on Penn Avenue before I found out why he needed me urgently.

A crushed disk in his lower back was compressing the nerve beneath it. This extremely painful condition was one he was never willing to risk a laminectomy to relieve, because he had a family of seven to feed and the operation at the time carried a 50 percent chance of paralysis. This outcome was unthinkable to him. Well that day, I can’t imagine, solid, stoic dependable Saul, fighting back tears of pain, driving into Oakland. He said he was okay standing, but sitting was agony and such agony that he almost passed out from it. But he couldn’t get to work unless he sat to drive those 20 minutes or so and my purpose was simply to talk to him, talk him through it, be with him, anything really, just to help him keep his mind off the white hot poker in his back. That driver’s seat was about as comfortable as a hot frying pan. He pulled over twice on Penn Avenue alone, because he’d almost blacked out and lost control of the car.

Truthfully I don’t remember anything about what film we developed, what pictures we printed, or slides we made. I just remember that trip and the terrible courage and discipline it must have taken to sit in that car and drive a manual transmission, 20 minutes, each way. Every pothole in the road. Every shift of the gear, stop and start, torture.

Call him crazy. Call me crazy for admiring him in this single-minded, if reckless mission. Yet, anybody who knows my Dad knows how important his work was to him. I don’t think it was so crazy. I think that this was his defiant response to his pain which he would endure in some form, for the rest of his life, his defiance, as bad as it got, he would rise above it. From that day forward pain would always ride in the back seat, because his obligations to wife, family and the physician educators who depended on him were too important. I hope he never suffered any more than he suffered that day. Me, I was too dumb to even be scared though I should have been. What I learned that scary day was how deeply a man can and should care about who he is and what he does. That is a lesson I plan to pass on to my sons, though I hope to find a less dramatic way to illustrate it.

The picture in Dad’s high school yearbook says, Saul Weiss, Championship Football Team Capt 44, Camera Club President, Song Yell and Motto Committee. Girls all swoon for him. Five foot nine. Shock of golden hair and a smile like a sunbeam. Girls all swoon for him.

How did Dad feel about the women in his life? Anybody with the temerity to suggest that Saul Weiss needed to get in touch with his feminine side would have been invited to a knuckle sandwich. Yet that bravura was so transparent. I saw my father with his own mother. Such tenderness, such sweetness.

Truth time. I hate nursing homes. The smell of urine, the demented wailing. The sounds of suffering. The omnipresence of death. Stepping off the elevator at the nursing home my Dad died in, I became eleven years old again visiting my grandparents. Then as now, you walk down the hall and all these sad, wizened faces pop up. Are you mine? Have you come for me? Can you take me home? Are you mine?

No. I’m not. I’m sorry. I wish I was your grandson or son. I even wish I was black death, come to ease your boredom, loneliness and loss of dignity. But I’m not.

At eleven, I avoided their gazes. I couldn’t bear them. At 51, though still scared I got off that elevator and forced myself to look them square in the face. I tell them with the respect in my eyes and my friendly hello that I could easily know you. You were young, lively. Your body was supple. You laughed at your own jokes. You fought. Made love. Made babies. Grieved those that went before you. Earned. Mattered. Cared. And you meant something to somebody. I hope you still do but that look you’re giving me says otherwise. So, if you matter only in this fleeting connection that passes between us, if you forget me as soon as I pass your field of vision, know that I know you and I will never look away again. Even if I can’t hope to bring what you really need. For that, you’ll have to wait just a little longer. I wish …

I wish my collective memories of my grandparents were sharper, more detailed. What I have seems barely worth its weight in salt. A tiny apartment. Kissing wrinkled faces. The smell of boiled chicken and old skin, the sight of aspirins large and white on pale, lined palms, the taste of chocolate halvah and pareve macaroons, Grandpa so tiny and quiet in the corner, that he blended with the wallpaper. These memories are insubstantial, unsatisfying, anemic little wisps that are barely mine but they are all I can cling to. Oh Esther, Oh Sam, I knew nothing of the redheaded firecracker, the indifferent cook who married the pushcart Eggman, raised three strapping clowning boys on Ward Street, braved the Depression and two World Wars, was suffragette, a Communist, a picketer for the social causes of the day and gave her baby son over to the gorgeous Italian girl next door who lost her own handsome Dad at sixteen. (Despite your teasing, she passed her driving test the first time out. Forgive me Dad, but you know and I know Mom was always a better driver than you were.)

But more, forgive me my disloyalty that when I looked at your beloved mother and father, particularly Grandma in her 80’s and 90’s I only saw the shells, desiccated by decades of health problems. Dad you saw something lovely in those sunken face and wide, vacant eyes. You didn’t even see the shells.

Gimme a kuss Mum. Give me a kiss Pup. The old man had a face like sandpaper and a smile like Tony Bennett. Gimme a kuss Mum. All he had to say and the old girl caught his spark like a sunbeam. She just turned on whenever he entered the room. Gimme a kuss. This was the woman he’d sacrificed a college career to nurse. Sacrifice never weighed on him, rather it lightened and ennobled him. Dad, it took a few years and you getting older and dying, but I get it now.

There are lots of stories from lots of people about Saul and Rita. Most involve crowds of people, big events, happy times. But I can sum up this most central relationship in my life with a very small, private story. The last meaningful thing I heard my father say occurred during the last call I made to his room at St. Barnabas before I left Philly for Pittsburgh. When I called, I said this is Rick and he said very weakly, “Hi Rick.” I asked how he was and his unconvincing reply was, “Okay.” Prompted by my mother, he said my name again and what sounded like goodbye, then trailed off. I started talking to my mother and I could hear him moaning in the background. When my mother asked “What do you need Sully? he bellowed out, clear as a bell, “YOUR HAND.” I think that says it all. Dad, I get it.

I don’t know if the night the poet spoke of is a good night. I don’t have the wisdom to know how you can even call it that. I don’t know if it makes a difference if you rage or go quietly. After a more than a decade of raging, in the end, Saul Martin Weiss, husband, father, grandfather, left quietly, with those of us who love him, either at his side or rushing to be with him.

I don’t know what he’ll find—if anything. But I do know what he left. Not one great golden act, rather a golden chain of good words, long talks, good deeds, good thoughts, riches stored up for the promise of a better world and his most important legacy, good people that he inspired to make it all so.

Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not love, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal. And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries, and all knowledge; and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not love, I am nothing. … Love suffereth long, and is kind; Love envieth not; love vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up, Doth not behave itself unseemly, seeketh not her own, is not easily provoked, thinketh no evil; Rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the truth;

I am Saul, become Paul. Son of Schmul become Samuel. Son of sons. I have found and practiced the truest forms of love.

Saul left the richest legacy a man can leave. If what he finds is in any way weighed or measured against what he left, then Saul Martin Weiss, brilliant convert, man of conscience, is transfigured and he is as he always was, our beacon, fair and generous, loving and well-loved, truth telling and truth seeking, luminous and by any balance, a most gifted and fortunate soul.

Dad, you’d be the first to say I’ve gone on way too long, though neither of us could ever be faulted for verbal parsimony. Both of us are prone to a certain floweriness of language. I come by it honestly. We share the same middle name. I so miss our talks. Let me hear back from you, if only in my dreams. You can’t let me have the last word.

Here are the obituary links. Also two nice articles in Pittsburgh papers. Wonderful tributes:

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09103/962426-122.stm

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/obituaries/s_620345.html

http://www.legacy.com/gb2/default.aspx?bookID=3079617606124&view=1

http://www.legacy.com/postgazette/Obituaries.asp?Page=LifeStory&PersonID=126054892

Thursday, November 6, 2008

24 Hours Later


24 Hours Later

When I was twelve, my father and I rode past a police barricade in downtown Pittsburgh where a National Guardsman in riot gear stood watch. There had been race riots in Watts and Newark. There had been riots and a horrible racially motivated murder in York. Unrest was seething just a few miles from the safe, white suburban community in which we lived. It was 1969, MLK’s assassination and Malcolm X’s assassination were still fresh and raw in my mind and I asked my father if there would be a race war in this country. He said he wasn’t sure, but he felt optimistic that cooler heads would eventually prevail.


Shortly thereafter, we, the Weisses, broke bread with an African American family, I guarantee you, a first for my Italian/Russian extended family. What made the dinner even more interesting was that our host, Regis Debonis, was my father’s boss at Mercy hospital where he’d worked for over a decade. The Debonis family lived in a better house than we did. A new car was parked in their garage, while my father drove a battered clunker of a station wagon that was older than I was. Their kids wore new clothes. We wore hand-me-downs. In some families, this would and could have been the source of jealousy and enmity but for my family, this was what my educator sibs call a “teachable moment.” My father, as we drove home from that extraordinary, but entirely ordinary evening, argued that if white and black American families could just sit down to dinner as we’d just done, that most of our misunderstandings would go away.


These two events in 1969 dramatically “bookended” my understanding of race in America. How far apart we thought we were. How close we actually are. I am extremely grateful that my parents provided the direct personal experience to belie all of the stereotypes and bigotry I grew up with in my extended family. I think it was and is the rare experience, to grow up white in America and not confront racism in your own family—extended or otherwise. It was always a moral dilemma for me. Do you try to shout down your 85 year old Uncle Joe, headed to Purgatory for a long sit for the years of Sundays he dishonored my mother’s table with his steady invective spew? How do you confront your cousins, who you love and were raised with and tell them everything they think they know about race relations is wrong? In my urban Fairmount neighborhood, we’re close to families who tell of years of confrontations they had with “blacks” and how those confrontations confirmed the worst of everything their own parents taught them. In the last two years, we’ve had three muggings on my street, all black on white. How do you explain to people that you care about, that despite years of “the evidence of the street,” that you will never be suspicious or raise your children to be suspicious of somebody just because of their skin color. They look at you and say, “See, you are just being naive” and there’s some truth to it.


While I always clung to my father’s sense of reasonableness I also grew more cynical, as it seemed clear that the transcendent Civil Rights Movement leaders had been martyred only to be replaced by the lesser angels of victimhood and divisiveness who confirmed intolerant people’s worst assumptions about race, work ethic, diversity, intelligence and entitlement. People on both sides of the divide could then say knowingly, “See, nothing really changes.” I must confess that I had no reason to expect that a standard bearer of more enlightened race relations would ever rise again to articulate a message to the world that my immediate family had already internalized. The best that I could hope for was to stand on my own lessons and pass them to my children. So I’ve always felt a measure of pride, that we chose to live in a city where we are just one more “minority” in a multi-cultural pot of minorities, that my boys go to school with children of different and mixed races, that they bring friends of all races into our home, that we’ve been governed by three African American mayors and that in one important way, we’ve personally evolved beyond the experiences of the previous generation. My sons don’t see “color” in the same way that I did. They see racial prejudice, if they think about it at all, as a historical artifact and not something they’ve had to live with and confront.


What happened to our nation last night will teach the world what I learned as a boy of twelve. Families at dinner tables will be compelled by the evidence of their own eyes, to have new conversations and come to new conclusions. Centuries of “learned behavior” will be gradually unlearned and replaced by new beliefs. I have always held that America is the world’s greatest laboratory of change. Like the lessons of tolerance that my family learned, we’ve had scant evidence and scant reason to be optimistic about “the experiment” since the 60’s, but a mere 40+ years later, Barack has burst on to the world stage and has blazed trails, not of racial entitlement, but of human entitlement. He had plenty of opportunities at many turns during this campaign, to play “the race card” and chose not to. I doubt he ever will. Thanks to him, the concept of a “race card” became outdated last night and will pass in less than a generation into historical artifact.


John McCain called Barack, “MY PRESIDENT.” That is perhaps the first maverick thing that I’ve heard him say of late that I completely endorse. For decades, I have not been able to say those words with any sense of pride of ownership. Rather, I was more inclined to endorse Michelle Obama’s view of not always being proud of our country. If anything; I’d thought she’d understated the case. I have been telling Bennett, apologizing really, that my generation which had started with such starry-eyed idealism had capitulated so utterly. That is was going to be up to him and his generation to get pissed and pick up the mantle of activism that we’d dropped.


Kate, Char, K I thought of your beautiful mixed race daughters, your multinational sons and our multi-ethnic sons last night when my president ”used his words” to envisioned a world a hundred years from now. I held my breath. I got chills down my spine and dewy eyed for he’d conjured something that hadn’t existed the night before.


People have criticized Barack for being a man of words, but as leaders, parents and citizens, we use our words as evidence of ideas, intent and deeds that extend the thread of optimism, tentatively, one person, one family, at a time. In my life, optimism has been more often been based on a contrarian act of faith than evidence of durable human progress. But it really happened and it happened here and it happened last night. And I own a piece of it!


Today I am proud beyond measure to be an American and a citizen of the world. The generational compact of a better world passable to the children has never seemed more real. Barring cryogenic preservation, even the youngest of my fellow Boomers will not see the America of the 22nd Century, but we have set its stage so that Barack’s children and our children will. The idealism of the young is a precious and wonderful thing, to be protected and nurtured, but I’d argue that the reawakened idealism of the middle-aged is even more precious, for it is rare and most difficult to rekindle.


So cool.


rmw





From: Charlotte
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 11:20 AM
To: 'Donohue, Kate'
Subject: RE: Obama


This is a very touching and heartfelt piece, Kate! I am taking the opportunity to forward it to some of my friends and family……….thank you for sharing it!


I will never forget the camaraderie and sense of hope for the USA that I experienced working for weeks at the phone banks in the Obama HQ in Philly! Aside from being elated and I feel so sentimental that last night the greatness of the US of A was eventually demonstrated to the World after 8 years of ‘living in the dark ages’! As you say Kate, many young people will proceed through their lives with their idealism intact and I pray their will not be reason for this to cease! The look in many people’s eyes at Grant Park last night made me feel they were focused on a Messiah and at times I felt he was! Yes, I do believe Obama is intelligent and thoughtful enough to choose wise advisors to help him begin to solve some of our problems and ,as he himself mentioned, he will not be able to do so in 4 years, maybe not even 8 but I am convinced he will serve us and the nation to the best of his ability in a selfless and wise way!


FYI – Kenya declared a day of holiday in order to hold feasts to celebrate the victory of their ‘favourite son’! I was so tearful that neither his father, mother or grandmother could be on that stage with him and Michelle’s family last night!


Many warm thoughts to you all,


Char





From: Donohue, Kate
Sent: 05 November 2008 10:04
To: Donohue, Kate
Subject: Obama


Bevan was a flying pig for Halloween and I think that maybe this is the year that pigs really can fly -- last week the Phillies won the World Series and yesterday the United States elected its first African American President.


I volunteered as a poll watcher at a polling location in N Philly near Temple Univ yesterday. I saw so many young people voting for the first time, so excited, so hopeful. They cannot fully appreciate how remarkable this election was, and perhaps that is a good thing. These young people will go forward in life with their idealism intact, convinced that their vote counts and that nothing is impossible. This is just what our nation needs right now.


I shared a hug and misty eyes with a woman as she left the voting booth saying she never thought she would see the day… I witnessed a very frail gentleman arrive just before the polls closed (assisted by a young Obama campaign volunteer). He had been released from the hospital Monday, but wanted so much to vote. Truly it was an historic election.


While it feels like victory, the battle has just begun. President Obama will need all the prayers that we can send, and all the support that we can provide, to govern this country. Let’s hope that he has the wisdom, and that we have the courage, to resolve some of our problems…


k

Tuesday, September 2, 2008

Economic View--Dem's Better Bet for Economy

Even if:
  • You don’t believe that the Bush administration deliberately lied and then thoroughly screwed the pooch in Iraq from the start.
  • You don’t believe that there’s been an 8 year run up of graft and corruption as the administration guts the federal bureaucracy and turns public works into private profit for its donors.
  • You’re a Halliburton stock owner.
  • You don’t feel the election should be a referendum on the worst presidency in our nation’s history.
  • You like the rightwing social engineering and loss of privacy rights over the past 8 years.
  • You don’t mind that science takes a back seat to politics in Republican policymaking.
  • You don’t mind the Supreme Court being stacked with social conservatives.
  • You don’t mind that our allies think we’ve become a nation of isolationist, jingoistic, trigger happy, bible thumping, hypocritical Joe Sixpacks.
  • You don’t feel the current economic downturn is a direct result of failed national and international economic policies and misplaced tax incentives.
  • You don’t feel oil company profits are obscene and based on an international cabal that pollutes the planet and stymies home-grown innovation and alternative sources of energy.
  • You think offshore drilling won’t ever threaten the delicate ecosystem of our coastline and will bring back the era of $1/gallon gasoline.
  • You think “the war on terror” as defined by Bush is more important than redirecting those trillions into our crumbling infrastructure.
  • You're gullible enough to consider Mrs. Palin as a worthy member of the sisterhood of traveling pantsuits.
  • You don’t believe social conservatives consistently preach moral, ethical and social standards they or their families don’t live up to.
  • You think the gogo Governor of the reindeer state would make a better second in command or commander in chief than the scrapper from Scranton. So much for experience being the deciding factor.
  • You think John McCain (who is older than the gipper was) will stay awake, alive and healthy as a horse for the next 4 years.
  • Unlike the US Constitution, you feel military service and/or being a POW is a prerequisite and defacto ticket to the White House.
  • You make less than $5,000,000 and own less than 7 houses.
  • But most of all, even if you’re in the 95th income Percentile, (>$180,000).

The numbers don’t lie.

It is OUR economy and it can't take another 8 years of "stupid." Just think of your wallet too. It will love you more if you vote Dem in Novem. So, ignore my rant with impunity, but ignore this NY Times business post at your own peril, then go vote against the trickle down economic theories that have been about as effective as Soviet communism. America will thank you.

Tuesday, July 22, 2008

Walking Man 1


I'm a writer, which immediately qualifies me as the most sedentary of schleppers. Six years ago my lack of mobility, love of food and thickening waistline earned me a diagnosis of diabetes, the American Lifestyle Disease. Having two adult onset diabetic parents with failing health and a grandmother who died of the disease, I could hardly claim ignorance about the longterm consequences of the disease. I took a contrarian view. I took my diagnosis as a wakeup call and thus my goal with the help of a good doc, was to create gradual, sustainable and significant change in those aspects of my lifestyle that were and are risk factors. Serious walking began simply as an attempt to fold daily errands, stress reduction and vigorous exercise into my otherwise deskbound day. My Walkable City, Philadelphia, rewarded my efforts and spread its bounty before me.

The recent buzz about urban walkability ratings has jump-started this blogline, which up to now has existed only in my head (and feet). I haven’t figured out how to walk and write at the same time, but I’ve come close.

Nearly every day at 5:00, my eight year old son and I step out our front door and cross two busy streets. We’re off to collect Mom who works at the University of PA, Presbyterian Hospital 2.5 miles from our house. The boy and I both have our MP3 players plugged in and are enjoying our own private soundtracks. Mine has about 2000 songs. I don’t know if I’ll be listening to Leonard Cohen, Arvo Paart or Deep Purple. The random surprise of shuffle selection is the joy of it. Perhaps it fits that I also find the jangling hustle bustle of the city soothing. I’ve plugged in my musician-quality Shure E-4c earbuds, which when properly inserted in the ear canal, immediately knock out about 70% of the ambient noise while allowing me to enjoy the full tonal range of my music without cranking it.

Some folks think I’m irresponsible or shutting myself off from the world, but I’ll tell you it’s bliss. A bus rumbles by and I do hear it, but at quarter strength. Somewhere, a wailing fire engine closes in but I feel none of the instinctual panic you experience in your chest as the decibels build to a throbbing scream in your head. I live in the city. I don’t need any more noise. I have a choice about what goes in my ears, soundwise. It’s incredibly liberating. But this splendid aural isolation comes at a modest cost of increased visual acuity. “Look both ways before you cross the street. Then look again.” Mom said it and well into my second half century, these are good words to live by. The boy and I hold hands and communicate with gestures and hand signals. His stride is two steps to my one, but his pace is flowing and easy, a sort of skipping run. He enjoys this as much as I do. We fall quickly into a rhythm. I shift hands with him, to keep him on “the inside,” my body shielding his from oncoming traffic of any sort.

I share my own, more cautionary version of Mom’s bromide with both my boys. “Assume the people flying past you in their cars are psychos or idiots and can lose control of their cars in a split second. Pay attention and live.” A tad dramatic perhaps, but a little paranoia is healthy when it comes to navigating urban byways.

At this point, if I were just walking for pleasure, I'd have all kinds of choices. I’m on one of dozens of access points to the world's largest urban park. I can travel north or south along the Schuylkill River, a well-used recreational waterscape, where Ben Franklin himself picnicked and frolicked with his lady admirers. I could follow the river away from or directly into the leftbank heart of the city. Or I can climb the hill behind the Art Museum which winds through a Victorian walker's garden with its gazebo and trails, running back up to the museum which occupies the site of the Philadelphia Waterworks, the nation's first urban waterworks, the architectural and scientific marvel and travel destination of the 18th century. Heading west, I then cross the Spring Garden Street bridge, with its commanding northward view of the river, the museum and the waterworks, all which when seen by sunset, recall the colors of Sienna. The southward view is dominated by my favorite view of the Philadelphia skyline.

This may be a bit of hometown hubris, but frankly I'm surprised that Philadelphia ranks lower than New York and San Fran. in walkability. Maybe I and the study's authors have different definitions of walkability. I've been telling people for years that this is the most walkable city in the country and I stand by it. I've visited and walked them all, with the exception of Portland. The reasons for my preference are myriad. First of all, walking for me is a 20-30 mile per week activity. I average about 5 miles per hour. Try maintaining that pace in NYC and not slowing, dodging or colliding with other pedestrians. Hey you, I’m walkin’ here!

Don’t get me wrong. I love New York, love walking in it, eating in it, doing business or just having fun in it. New York is many bigger and better things, but more walkable than Philadelphia, it is not. To me, it boils down to modulation. New York’s skyline is so straight up and down, so constricted that even the parks and open spaces feel hemmed in. Not so here. Here the skyline offers, well, sky, room to breathe. Here a building can be appreciated, in context, like Cesar Pelli’s changeable magnificent Cira Center which maintains a dynamic ever-shifting dialogue with earth and sky. In New York it would be compressed into the same space with a dozen other buildings, all just as magnificent perhaps, but battling each other for eye-space, lost to their own scale. Here Cira and I have room to breath, to interact. So I greet it every day. It talks back to me. I feel we have a relationship.

Like many walkable urban neighborhoods, there are dozens of charming restaurants and shops less than mile from my doorstep. But here, Billy Penn’s rigorous, revolutionary gridwork of streets means that even the first time (walking) visitor stands little chance of getting lost. Several dramatic diagonal avenues, former farmer’s market pikes, radiate into or out of the city, (depending on your perspective), the most notable of these is the Benjamin Franklin Parkway, which in a few years, will, I predict, come to resemble Barcelona’s Las Ramblas in scale, grandeur and pedestrian amenities. Though its lights aren’t the most pedestrian-friendly, the BFP makes City Hall an easy 20 minute destination from my home in Fairmount. Philadelphia’s terrain is neither completely flat like Chi town’s, yet not so demanding that one needs bionic calves to handle the ascensions and declensions of say San Fran.

Not that my calves can’t handle the Golden City, thank you, it’s just that again, maintaining a sustainable pace is critical to my definition of walkability and walking as exercise. So is the aesthetic experience of it, the sense of variable, visual modulation, the confluence of greenery, open sky, open ground, dramatic vistas, urban structures and urban cultural amenities. In addition, Philadelphia has what few other of America's most walkable cities have and that is arguably the most extensive historical pedigree in the country, little gems of which constantly reveal themselves with little effort on the part of the observant walker. I imagine a future which I long for, but will probably never see, of walking these fair streets and byways, unperturbed by the infernal combustion machines that dominate the roads—for now.

Don’t get me wrong. I have a late model Toyota Avalon that I love and maintain like some guys pamper their sportier rides. I’ve put all of 10,000 miles on a year on it. I have already, by lifestyle and preference, reduced my “carbon footprint.” My only problem is when I have to suck in some of yours.

On the Spring Garden Street Bridge, we hold our breath to inhale a bit less of the blue gray sulfurous spew coming from a particularly noxious SUV with a failing transmission. Will the vehicle even make its destination? Do I know something that the driver doesn’t?

Perhaps not, but I do have a theory. It came to me on the Spring Garden Street Bridge while watching drivers jockeying to make the turn onto the Expressway down ramp. I’ve come to believe that learning to drive a car was the first step to the emotional distancing that allowed Air force pilots to carpet bomb entire villages in Vietnam, then blithely suck down cold beers in Saigon officers’ clubs an hour later. Conversely keeping feet on the street keeps you connected in ways too intimate for some people to handle. The more machine you put between yourself and your own transport, the more distanced you are. The boy and I stand with a commanding view of the Schuylkill Expressway, watching the spasmodic progress of what I call the red snake and its opposing cousin, the white snake. It’s hard to imagine all the individuals in all those cars as singular entities rather than just segments of the snakes.

Imagine all this, without cars, I tell my son. He’s heard it before. The power and the clarity of the idea make us pause. Perhaps it’s just the fumes. I heard today that GM’s quarterly earning statement had plunged. Corporate spokespeople said and I quote, they were “caught offguard by declining sales and Americans’ efforts to conserve fuel by buying smaller and fewer vehicles.” Caught offguard???? It must be a real talent to say something like that and not look incredibly stupid doing so. Then again, I guess if you manufacture Hummers, there’s lot about sustainable transportation choices that will catch you offguard. It’s just like the 70’s, just 30 years later.

BTW, I've been off diabetes meds for over a year and have managed my disease into remission by diet and exercise alone. I've lost 60 pounds and all the aches and pains that I used to get in my knees and legs are gone. I have, in my own opinion at least, America's most walkable city to thank. Sign me, the Philadelphia Walking Man

Wednesday, January 23, 2008

Think Different

My son’s recent acceptance at the premiere creative and performance arts high school in Philadelphia inspired this look back down the path that brought us here. This is our story, but I don’t think it’s entirely unique by any means. For good or not, the world is a lot more complex than when we were kids and just went to the reliable neighborhood primary school and high school. For the better part of B’s academic career we paid 5 figure tuitions and battled with a hidebound administration (in his old school) that didn’t have a clue as to how to handle kids like B who are challenged by traditional academics. For years, they ratcheted up a case for warehousing our talented son in even more expensive suburban “special needs schools” that would have taxed our already strained budget and meant hours of grinding commute time each day. It wasn’t just a matter of finances and lifestyle. There were and are deeper principles at stake, namely, what rights we as consumers of the “educational product” are entitled to.

Three main federal laws apply to public schools. These are the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Section 504), and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), passed in 1990. Though the public schools are the most strained and underfunded of all public institutions, they are required to educate every kid to the standards of the state. They may not be able to get the funds they need for more than basic programs, but they are mandated to take on all comers unless they pose a hazard to the school and even then, they are required to accommodate as best they can.

What legal protections exist for private school students? The answer is virtually none. Unless they accept federal funds, private schools are kinda like the Boy Scouts. You have the right to pay the tuition. They have carte blanche to discriminate or select as they see fit. You have the right to suck it up and move on if they feel your kid isn’t a “good fit.”

For 5 years, we were told that B’s “differences” put him in “academic jeopardy” and made him incompatible with the school he was enrolled in. They implied that we were less than intelligent or responsible parents if we didn’t understand this. The other argument, the most specious in my opinion, was that with their 15/1 student teacher ratio, learning specialists, state-of-the-art libraries, media labs and rich endowment, that this poor beleaguered institution wasn’t “set up” to meet the educational demands of special needs kids. That it wouldn’t be fair to the other children. When I tell this to public school educators, they roll their eyes and laugh derisively. Still, most private school parents when confronted with the case against their child’s continued inclusion swallow their disappointment, take the hint and pull their kids out. Who can blame them? But we didn’t do this. Why? Because we understand our son and we saw the flipside far better than they did.

The flipside was that B loved his school. He was fortunate to be mentored by a handful of inspired teachers (mostly in the arts) who “got him” and we credit these creative educators for their independent role in his success. From his perspective, his experience was far more positive than negative. He worked very hard, learned a lot, had fun, had a flawless behavior record and maintained an overall 3.0 GPA. He and we cherished the close society of his friends, most of whom he’s known since kindergarten.

We count as one of our greatest successes that we were able to mitigate the pressure so that he was largely unaware of it. He never knew that his former academic advisor, a horrid little witch of a teacher who stood over him in her own words “for ten minutes, timing him with a stopwatch while he fumbled to open his locker” was making a value judgment against him. He never knew about the stunningly arrogant music teacher who wrote that B “lacked the mental ability” to focus on his course. He never met the abrasive “school psychologist” whose opinions the administrators leaned so heavily on, though she was in fact was unqualified to evaluate him because she was only a sociologist by credential. Even so, judging from her age and backward attitudes, it’s likely that said educational credentials were gained some time before the Sputnik launch. From my discussions with other parents, it became clear that her sole raison d’ĂȘtre at the school was to weed out the “different ones.” For four years, we sat across the table from this hatchet woman until I put my foot down and refused any meeting that she attended. We got so much more done without her.

Believe you me, I came to those meetings with much more than parental emotions in tow. I presented research results on the efficacy of mainstreaming mildly learning challenged kids. I developed an individualized education plan with help and ideas from educator siblings and friends. Kara and I read and worked at times on a daily basis with the teachers we knew we could count on to track B’s progress and challenges. We also spent several European vacations worth of funds on private tutors, private evaluators and private testing because the private school “psychologist” convinced us that we wouldn’t find adequate resources in the public sector.

Yet every year, for four years, it was as if the private school had purged our son’s details from their institutional memory banks. Every year, we started afresh at an end-of-first term meeting in which B’s academic challenges were detailed with dire predictions about his ability to make the grade and manage emotionally. Always reactive – never proactive. Every year, we’d all buckle down, engage the accommodations and B’s grades would rise across the board. Several times every year, I’d do a reality check and ask him if he was happy with his school. Every year he said he loved it and was willing to do the work to stay there. With that his mother and I vowed he could go there as long as he wanted. And that is the reason, more than any other that we dug our heels in. In the process, we learned new definitions for perseverance, academic success and hard work. These are lessons they don’t teach you in school, lessons learned from our own son.

We worked tirelessly within the system. We challenged, lobbied and cajoled the people on the other end of the table. We tested B privately when they said we needed to. We visited the special needs schools we knew we couldn’t afford. We paid for expensive tutoring. But we were prepared to go further, much, much further. By this, I mean the following. I reasoned that if the private school in using public school bussing was in fact accepting federal aid directly or indirectly, that one or more of the federal or state mandated inclusiveness statutes might apply to them. I was one phone call away from testing that assumption and discovering if we could turn this tiny bit of leverage into a court case to test our rights. I guess we’re all fortunate that it never got that far.

The turning point came in late 2006, 7th grade, when I sat in the middle school director’s office and she told me that she had “no vested interest in helping B enroll in any other high school than their own.” This was the very same administrator who in this and many prior meetings had told us that B was not ideally suited to her school. I told her that I was grateful for her candor (chillingly Catch 22 though it was). That night Kara and I went into emergency session. The open enrollment period for out of neighborhood public schools had lapsed three months prior, but through an incredible stroke of luck or vigilance, I learned that our neighborhood association was holding a “Schools Night.” So, on that raw, rain-soaked December night, we buttonholed a Philadelphia School District official who listened sympathetically to (a much abbreviated version of) our tale and committed to working with us. I don’t know what strings she pulled if any, but through her ministrations, we were able to enroll B in the highly-sought-after William Meredith School, where for the first time, school administrators worked in concert with us, rather than at odds. Words hardly express what a revelation and relief it has been, but I can tell you that our experience this school year has turned all the private school “experts’” stereotypes about the public sector on their ear.

For many years, we’d been asked why we chose this uphill path for so long, rather than accept the recommendations of “the experts.” The answer was simple. The experts, in this case were wrong and short-sighted. If a child is an artist/scholar, musician/scholar, athlete/scholar, entrepreneur/scholar or a computer whiz/scholar or is gifted or challenged in any way that diverges from the scholastic norm, then chances are that the experts just don’t get them. Advocating for your child and charting the right course is then left to entirely to parents and guardians who have to make difficult, incredibly important decisions, with little guidance from the traditional academic community. I think they expect you to fail. In fact, I think they rely on it. I look forward to the day when the academic communities in private and in public schools learn to truly embrace inclusiveness and scholastic diversity. In B’s old private school, which touts its diversity, it became clear that they really meant inclusiveness and diversity in a very specific, narrow range. We found it curious that this diversity never included a single blind, deaf or physically disabled kid. Some day, some family with a fire in its collective belly is going to take on a private school in a court of law and challenge and prevail on just these issues.

It makes you wonder why private schools, while selling their inclusiveness, apply it with such aggressive selectivity. Perhaps that too is a marketing decision, as if word got out that a mainstream private school truly caters to special needs they might be inundated with applications from less “desirable” applicants. Is it overly cynical to suggest that the marketing image of inclusiveness trumps the reality of inclusiveness?

We’ve also learned that different sectors have vastly different understandings of what it means to be “special needs.” This year, Kara and I have seen a stark contrast between what “special needs” means in private schools versus public schools. If the Philadelphia Inquirer is to believed, In the public schools sadly, “special needs” is often synonymous with disruption and discipline problems. It seems unlikely that B, if he’d been enrolled in a public school from the start, would have ever been flagged for his mild but real special learning needs. In private schools, special needs means everybody who does not fit within their narrow beam. Both are failed models.

My take is that ALL OF US, all learners have “special needs.” If you take that statement to its logical conclusion, it means up-ending the cookie cutter approach to education and truly addressing the special needs of every individual, whatever their abilities and talents. You only have to look at U.S. science, math and literacy test comparisons with other advanced cultures to see that the traditional American model is failing even the traditional scholars. The failure is wide and systemic, a failure in particular, of our baby boomer generation, who may have started out “thinking different” but quickly lapsed into familiar rubrics perhaps because we are distracted by the political exigencies of four decades of fruitless, arrogant petroleum cowboy diplomacy. I’m waiting for a politician, a presidential candidate to point this out and then detail the vision for overhauling both our education infrastructure and our roads and bridges. Republican, Democrat or Independent, that’s the person who will get my zealous support. I’m not holding my breath. I’ve not seen any of the current field with the courage, honesty or zealotry to tackle these, the truly most important infrastructure issues we face as we pass on our legacy to the next generation.

From my perspective in the adult e-learning business, I sense that an educational revolution is at hand. There are technology and training solutions coming down the pike that will make fundamental differences. Communications tools are coming to the forefront that are creating economically viable, scalable, customized lifelong education for everybody who needs it. Embracing “universal special needs” will drive a true revolution in education. But first, I think it will involve an overhaul in the base premise, in leadership, in thinking, in educational modeling. God, I hope it happens soon. Two hundred years ago, a teenager like B would have left a traditional academic environment and been engaged as an apprentice by a master artist or craftsman. It’s clear that something was lost when our culture shifted from the apprentice/mentor model to the industrial age model of education where centuries later, we’re still stuck. Perhaps five years from now, parents and students will have more choices, more information and more flexible and creative solutions from the academic world. By that point, the Weiss family will be embroiled in the next great challenge of engaging a higher education system that seems to have largely distanced itself from its legacy commitment to the learning needs of the middle class.

Plenty of parents and students face issues similar to ours. Our story has a happy ending so far. At the end of a lot of hard work, independent research and tireless advocacy, our talented artist/scholar will receive the academic training and creative mentoring that he merits. Looking back on our experiences, we can find no regrets, no false steps or do-overs. Well, maybe we could have saved several thousand bucks, had we learned sooner to recognize and distrust the most patently self-serving advice we were given. Ours is the luck born of hard work. If there is a single lesson to be distilled from our experience, it’s that when it comes to education, “challenging authority” and “thinking different” aren’t just shopworn boomer bromides, but life skills that we and our children will need to succeed in a world that no longer regards us as the last word. How can America regain its academic pre-eminence? Engaging a concept like universal special needs might just be the answer.