Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Saul M. Weiss, Semper Fidelis

This is my eulogy for my beloved Dad, who died on April 10th of this year. The original version was shorter and designed to be delivered in a Church, but through mishap, a quirk of fate, honest mistake, whatever, neither I nor my sibs were called up to share our final words to honor our father. Yes, it is possible to screw up a funeral. After the numbness of the day, after the anger had faded, my next thought was to seal my offering in an envelope, take it to a quiet spot in the country, light it up and never look upon it again. I've had a change of heart. In hopes that the dead have infinite bandwidth, I submit this for your approval Pop. Feel free to edit and get back to me.

Saul Weiss, Wednesday, March 9, 1927 – Friday, April 10, 2009

Do not go gentle into that good night. … Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

These lines of Dylan Thomas’s were special to my father because he spoke them at the funeral of my grandmother Esther Colker Weiss and memorialized them on a plaque following those services. A professional lifetime spent in putting a camera on top of microscopes and over the shoulders of doctors and scientists left my father a rational man, a skilled technician, deeply committed and proud of his contribution to the textbooks, slide catalogues, lectures and presentations that physicians use to pass on medical knowledge.

Very much not the type to wear his heart on his sleeve, Saul M Weiss nonetheless had a deep emotional reservoir. We’ve heard and read about his accomplishments, but it’s to this emotional side of Saul Weiss, that I’d like to speak today. The very first time I encountered it was in 1967. Dad stood in the doorway of 4149 Branding Place and he was weeping bitterly over the death of his father, who in these last couple of years, he’d grown to resemble in my eyes. It wasn’t an easy transformation to witness any more than seeing a grown man sobbing, blaming himself for the death of his father. Even at 10 years old, I knew it couldn’t be true, but I was rattled. I’d never heard him talk that way. I had never seen him cry. When he saw my reaction, he called me over, threw a hairy arm over my shoulder, pressed me to his wet scratchy face and said it was okay, that men cry sometimes and there was no shame in it.

Most often Dad’s emotional currents ran lighter, with toleration, optimism and pride, even in the face of injustice. In 1969, the troubles of the turbulent sixties reached inside our old clunker of a family car and touched me directly. There was a racially motivated murder in York, PA. There were race riots in Newark, Watts and Pittsburgh. Dad and I drove through, East Liberty, I think and we saw a National Guardsman at a barricade with a riot gun. He was blockading a street with horrid looking houses in front of which stood parked late model Lincolns and Cadillacs. Each car better than the Ramber Dad was driving. I’m sure the car was older than I was at the time. I asked my father two questions that day.

First, I wanted to know if we were about to have a race war in this country. Whatever personal anxieties that question raised, he turned to me very gently and said he truly believed cooler heads would prevail. It was all I needed to hear. I then asked him how all those people on that street, if they were so poor, could drive Lincolns and Cadillacs, while our car was rust-paneled station wagon that rattled when it stopped or started. He said, “Son, when people are deprived the opportunity to live in decent houses and work at decent jobs, they put whatever dignity they have into their cars.” The eloquence and insight of his responses, the dignity that day, was all his.

I’m still processing these life lessons, when later that summer, we were invited to dinner at the house of Rege Debonis, dad’s boss at Mercy Hospital. Rege and his family are just like us, except that they had a nicer house, nicer car, nicer clothes and they’re black. After a lovely meal, my father driving us home announced proudly that if everybody could sit down and break bread like our two families had, that the racial problems in this country would soon be over. Although Dad lived a life of “intolerance of intolerance”, these two events set and bookended my feelings about race and exhibited the emotional wisdom and tolerance of Saul Weiss.

Dad was such a square-shouldered guy. I never heard him swear worse than the word ‘damn.’ I never heard him use an epithet racial or otherwise, abuse or speak ill of anybody. I never knew him as anything but scrupulously honest and fair in all his dealings. From him and my mother, I’ve received these examples as a gift, the gift of clarity, a clear and unambiguous understanding of what it means to be fair which encompassed everything from how to treat people in business to how children should be raised up. Teach honesty by being honest yourself, even if to a fault. We all know honesty is the best policy, but it isn’t always easy to live with. My mother can tell you that.

When we lived in New Orleans Mom and Dad were invited during Mardi Gras, to the Krewe of Comus Tableau Ball, a grand affair for 3,000 people at the Gaiety Theatre. Young men and women, sons and daughters of New Orleans elite, sashayed past elaborately costumed as swans, pirates, fairies, bowing and curtseying for the admiration of parents and other distinguished spectators. My own parent turned to a distinguished gentleman seated next to him and said, “Y’know, I gave up playing Peter Pan when I was eleven.”

The distinguished gentleman turned to him and snarled, “Suh, that’s mah daughta out thae-uh!”

Trouble is, the fruit doesn’t fall far from the tree.
Trouble is, I got into similar trouble with the last person in the world that you’d want to. That’s right, my own mother. Two weeks ago Mom and I were on our way to visit Dad at the Nursing Home. Not that I’d needed an excuse, but I’d missed another opportunity to attend Sunday Mass doing another one of my late night writing stints. Mother was upset. She asked, “”What’s wrong, don’t you believe in God anymore?”
I said, “Mom, you don’t want to have this conversation with me.”
She said, “Yes I do.”

So we had it.

It wasn’t easy, telling her the truth about what I believe and don’t believe, because at the very least I knew I’d upset her at the very time that the very last thing I’d want to do is upset her.

Mom, though I do dearly love you, I do not believe:
· in a God who is petitionable by prayer.
· that his only begotten Son was born of a Virgin, suffered, died, was buried and rose from the dead to free me from my sins and allow me entry to the gates of heaven that were barred to all men, good or bad, since Adam and Eve who I also don’t believe in.
· Original Sin
· that Communion is anything more than a symbol for the Body and Blood of Christ,
· that the Bible is anything more than good words written by inspired men.
· I don’t believe in Heaven, a God with a gender, a white beard, mercy, love, a son, an army of angels, a temper and all the other anthropomorphicisms humans ascribe to their Gods? Aren’t these all just tales we tell each other in our rather mixed attempts to cherish each other, do good and further the cause of a moral society.
I do believe:
· That prayer might have power, but that that power emanates from those who pray and those who are prayed for.
· You don’t need a church to pray. I pray in my walks about the city, at this keyboard, my spirit worships the beauty of the cosmos, human genius, and the sweet happy faces of children.
· If there is a God, this entity is so far beyond my understanding, as far beyond the daily lives and sins of humans as a car’s backfire is from the Big Bang.
· I am a sinner, but I believe if there is forgiveness or redemption to be had, it’s only from the people I have wronged.
· I’d like to believe in an afterlife, if only because my own ego has a hard time accepting that when I die, that nothing will remain of me but memories. But since nobody has returned to say otherwise, I remain skeptical. All evidence suggests that when I or anybody dies, that we cease to exist.
· In being good. Playing nice with others. Picking my toys up (I’m a little weak on the last one) though I endeavor to be a good man. I think the rest of the spiritual stuff pretty much follows from that.
· That love should be saved for people and the creature that inhabit our world. Deities, if they exist don’t need my love. I invest my love in people, my family and friends, a few cats and the beautiful planet that sustains us all.
· That there is more of “God” in a tree than in a church
· That if there is an omniscient, all powerful Creator, “He” will have to be happy with that.

If “He” isn’t, if “He” is so vindictive and egotistical as to consign me to eternal damnation based on my skepticism alone, how can “He” claim any mercy, omniscience or omnipotence.

Okay, I gave her a much shorter version, but Mom knows more than enough to be praying in earnest for my immortal soul, to which I respond, it never hurts to have good people on your side.

At which point, half the people here are muttering under their breaths jeeze, why didn’t you shut up and just go to church with your mother? What kind of son are you? I am Richard, son of Saul become Paul. Son of Schmul become Sam. I am my father’s son, son of sons and I cannot lie to my mother. I never could.

It was to this very issue, that my father imparted the sagest advice he ever gave me, his profoundest bit of truth, the truth that defines me, the kind of son, brother, family member, friend I am and the kind of father I am. After a particularly intolerant priest denied me a dispensation (recognition of my impending marriage by the Catholic Church) because I wouldn’t subject my wife AND her family to the same hour long personal interrogation I went through, we were in crisis. I agonized over the split this would cause between my devout Catholic family and my soon to be wife and her devout Protestant family.

My wise father took me aside and said, “Son, your mother loves her God, but she loves you, her children more.”

This little diamond blew out all the anxiety and cobwebs. This truth launched my marriage 29 years ago, and it certainly crystallized the mutual admiration society between my lovely Kara and my parents that exists to this very day. For I also know with utter certainty that what Saul said about Rita loving her children most of all applied just as much to him, as to her. This is the kind of love that stands up to God, the devil, the priest, death or all the adversity the world can throw at you and says ‘Honey, don’t worry, I got your back and I always will.’

I know my brothers and sisters have tapped this emotional wisdom in our father. I know this because I’ve seen them all in action. They know. They know that’s what family is. Dependable. That’s what a Weiss is. Honest and fair. That’s who we are. That’s what we do.

Let me tell you of another current that fed the emotional aquifer of Saul Weiss. Dad was always intellectually ravenous and proud of every scrap of knowledge he gained in his life. In spite of or more, because he never finished college, he had a hunger, a fierce passion for learning. He chewed me out royally for my year-long sabbatical from college to “find myself.” He saw it as a lost opportunity. Button-popping proud of his contribution to the knowledge of medical students and doctors, he was equally proud of the knowledge he absorbed in the process. He saw this as more than a double bonus, a sacred and honorable trust. Surrounded in his work by doctors and health care professionals, he soaked in knowledge like a sponge and shared it freely with us.

The lesson of Saul is plain… If you want to know more, surround yourself with people who know more than you, then share. He believed that the value of, the essence of knowledge is that it’s worthless unless shared. Dad shared at home by being a lively debater, a skeptic, a man of strong opinions, a passionate, articulate talker. Always philosophical he was nonetheless earthy, a man as in love with the life of the mind as he was respectful of the humble origins and humble people from whom he sprang.

Perhaps the strangest take on the emotional stuff Saul Weiss was made of comes from a story of how my father approached discipline. I’m not talking about spare the rod spoil the child, ‘it hurts me more than it hurts you’ variety, though we know a little something about that brand of discipline. I’m talking about the much sterner stuff to be found in self-discipline.

Picture, a glorious early summer bright Saturday, I’m maybe my son Bennett’s age and Dad, in a sort of tense, conspiratorial way comes to me and says “I need you to go to work with me.’ Not “Do you want to go?” No. “I need you.” Well I puffed up like a peacock to be considered so indispensible by him. We got in the little yellow Volkswagen he’d just bought, and I think we must have been on Penn Avenue before I found out why he needed me urgently.

A crushed disk in his lower back was compressing the nerve beneath it. This extremely painful condition was one he was never willing to risk a laminectomy to relieve, because he had a family of seven to feed and the operation at the time carried a 50 percent chance of paralysis. This outcome was unthinkable to him. Well that day, I can’t imagine, solid, stoic dependable Saul, fighting back tears of pain, driving into Oakland. He said he was okay standing, but sitting was agony and such agony that he almost passed out from it. But he couldn’t get to work unless he sat to drive those 20 minutes or so and my purpose was simply to talk to him, talk him through it, be with him, anything really, just to help him keep his mind off the white hot poker in his back. That driver’s seat was about as comfortable as a hot frying pan. He pulled over twice on Penn Avenue alone, because he’d almost blacked out and lost control of the car.

Truthfully I don’t remember anything about what film we developed, what pictures we printed, or slides we made. I just remember that trip and the terrible courage and discipline it must have taken to sit in that car and drive a manual transmission, 20 minutes, each way. Every pothole in the road. Every shift of the gear, stop and start, torture.

Call him crazy. Call me crazy for admiring him in this single-minded, if reckless mission. Yet, anybody who knows my Dad knows how important his work was to him. I don’t think it was so crazy. I think that this was his defiant response to his pain which he would endure in some form, for the rest of his life, his defiance, as bad as it got, he would rise above it. From that day forward pain would always ride in the back seat, because his obligations to wife, family and the physician educators who depended on him were too important. I hope he never suffered any more than he suffered that day. Me, I was too dumb to even be scared though I should have been. What I learned that scary day was how deeply a man can and should care about who he is and what he does. That is a lesson I plan to pass on to my sons, though I hope to find a less dramatic way to illustrate it.

The picture in Dad’s high school yearbook says, Saul Weiss, Championship Football Team Capt 44, Camera Club President, Song Yell and Motto Committee. Girls all swoon for him. Five foot nine. Shock of golden hair and a smile like a sunbeam. Girls all swoon for him.

How did Dad feel about the women in his life? Anybody with the temerity to suggest that Saul Weiss needed to get in touch with his feminine side would have been invited to a knuckle sandwich. Yet that bravura was so transparent. I saw my father with his own mother. Such tenderness, such sweetness.

Truth time. I hate nursing homes. The smell of urine, the demented wailing. The sounds of suffering. The omnipresence of death. Stepping off the elevator at the nursing home my Dad died in, I became eleven years old again visiting my grandparents. Then as now, you walk down the hall and all these sad, wizened faces pop up. Are you mine? Have you come for me? Can you take me home? Are you mine?

No. I’m not. I’m sorry. I wish I was your grandson or son. I even wish I was black death, come to ease your boredom, loneliness and loss of dignity. But I’m not.

At eleven, I avoided their gazes. I couldn’t bear them. At 51, though still scared I got off that elevator and forced myself to look them square in the face. I tell them with the respect in my eyes and my friendly hello that I could easily know you. You were young, lively. Your body was supple. You laughed at your own jokes. You fought. Made love. Made babies. Grieved those that went before you. Earned. Mattered. Cared. And you meant something to somebody. I hope you still do but that look you’re giving me says otherwise. So, if you matter only in this fleeting connection that passes between us, if you forget me as soon as I pass your field of vision, know that I know you and I will never look away again. Even if I can’t hope to bring what you really need. For that, you’ll have to wait just a little longer. I wish …

I wish my collective memories of my grandparents were sharper, more detailed. What I have seems barely worth its weight in salt. A tiny apartment. Kissing wrinkled faces. The smell of boiled chicken and old skin, the sight of aspirins large and white on pale, lined palms, the taste of chocolate halvah and pareve macaroons, Grandpa so tiny and quiet in the corner, that he blended with the wallpaper. These memories are insubstantial, unsatisfying, anemic little wisps that are barely mine but they are all I can cling to. Oh Esther, Oh Sam, I knew nothing of the redheaded firecracker, the indifferent cook who married the pushcart Eggman, raised three strapping clowning boys on Ward Street, braved the Depression and two World Wars, was suffragette, a Communist, a picketer for the social causes of the day and gave her baby son over to the gorgeous Italian girl next door who lost her own handsome Dad at sixteen. (Despite your teasing, she passed her driving test the first time out. Forgive me Dad, but you know and I know Mom was always a better driver than you were.)

But more, forgive me my disloyalty that when I looked at your beloved mother and father, particularly Grandma in her 80’s and 90’s I only saw the shells, desiccated by decades of health problems. Dad you saw something lovely in those sunken face and wide, vacant eyes. You didn’t even see the shells.

Gimme a kuss Mum. Give me a kiss Pup. The old man had a face like sandpaper and a smile like Tony Bennett. Gimme a kuss Mum. All he had to say and the old girl caught his spark like a sunbeam. She just turned on whenever he entered the room. Gimme a kuss. This was the woman he’d sacrificed a college career to nurse. Sacrifice never weighed on him, rather it lightened and ennobled him. Dad, it took a few years and you getting older and dying, but I get it now.

There are lots of stories from lots of people about Saul and Rita. Most involve crowds of people, big events, happy times. But I can sum up this most central relationship in my life with a very small, private story. The last meaningful thing I heard my father say occurred during the last call I made to his room at St. Barnabas before I left Philly for Pittsburgh. When I called, I said this is Rick and he said very weakly, “Hi Rick.” I asked how he was and his unconvincing reply was, “Okay.” Prompted by my mother, he said my name again and what sounded like goodbye, then trailed off. I started talking to my mother and I could hear him moaning in the background. When my mother asked “What do you need Sully? he bellowed out, clear as a bell, “YOUR HAND.” I think that says it all. Dad, I get it.

I don’t know if the night the poet spoke of is a good night. I don’t have the wisdom to know how you can even call it that. I don’t know if it makes a difference if you rage or go quietly. After a more than a decade of raging, in the end, Saul Martin Weiss, husband, father, grandfather, left quietly, with those of us who love him, either at his side or rushing to be with him.

I don’t know what he’ll find—if anything. But I do know what he left. Not one great golden act, rather a golden chain of good words, long talks, good deeds, good thoughts, riches stored up for the promise of a better world and his most important legacy, good people that he inspired to make it all so.

Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not love, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal. And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries, and all knowledge; and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not love, I am nothing. … Love suffereth long, and is kind; Love envieth not; love vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up, Doth not behave itself unseemly, seeketh not her own, is not easily provoked, thinketh no evil; Rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the truth;

I am Saul, become Paul. Son of Schmul become Samuel. Son of sons. I have found and practiced the truest forms of love.

Saul left the richest legacy a man can leave. If what he finds is in any way weighed or measured against what he left, then Saul Martin Weiss, brilliant convert, man of conscience, is transfigured and he is as he always was, our beacon, fair and generous, loving and well-loved, truth telling and truth seeking, luminous and by any balance, a most gifted and fortunate soul.

Dad, you’d be the first to say I’ve gone on way too long, though neither of us could ever be faulted for verbal parsimony. Both of us are prone to a certain floweriness of language. I come by it honestly. We share the same middle name. I so miss our talks. Let me hear back from you, if only in my dreams. You can’t let me have the last word.

Here are the obituary links. Also two nice articles in Pittsburgh papers. Wonderful tributes:

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09103/962426-122.stm

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/obituaries/s_620345.html

http://www.legacy.com/gb2/default.aspx?bookID=3079617606124&view=1

http://www.legacy.com/postgazette/Obituaries.asp?Page=LifeStory&PersonID=126054892

Thursday, November 6, 2008

24 Hours Later


24 Hours Later

When I was twelve, my father and I rode past a police barricade in downtown Pittsburgh where a National Guardsman in riot gear stood watch. There had been race riots in Watts and Newark. There had been riots and a horrible racially motivated murder in York. Unrest was seething just a few miles from the safe, white suburban community in which we lived. It was 1969, MLK’s assassination and Malcolm X’s assassination were still fresh and raw in my mind and I asked my father if there would be a race war in this country. He said he wasn’t sure, but he felt optimistic that cooler heads would eventually prevail.


Shortly thereafter, we, the Weisses, broke bread with an African American family, I guarantee you, a first for my Italian/Russian extended family. What made the dinner even more interesting was that our host, Regis Debonis, was my father’s boss at Mercy hospital where he’d worked for over a decade. The Debonis family lived in a better house than we did. A new car was parked in their garage, while my father drove a battered clunker of a station wagon that was older than I was. Their kids wore new clothes. We wore hand-me-downs. In some families, this would and could have been the source of jealousy and enmity but for my family, this was what my educator sibs call a “teachable moment.” My father, as we drove home from that extraordinary, but entirely ordinary evening, argued that if white and black American families could just sit down to dinner as we’d just done, that most of our misunderstandings would go away.


These two events in 1969 dramatically “bookended” my understanding of race in America. How far apart we thought we were. How close we actually are. I am extremely grateful that my parents provided the direct personal experience to belie all of the stereotypes and bigotry I grew up with in my extended family. I think it was and is the rare experience, to grow up white in America and not confront racism in your own family—extended or otherwise. It was always a moral dilemma for me. Do you try to shout down your 85 year old Uncle Joe, headed to Purgatory for a long sit for the years of Sundays he dishonored my mother’s table with his steady invective spew? How do you confront your cousins, who you love and were raised with and tell them everything they think they know about race relations is wrong? In my urban Fairmount neighborhood, we’re close to families who tell of years of confrontations they had with “blacks” and how those confrontations confirmed the worst of everything their own parents taught them. In the last two years, we’ve had three muggings on my street, all black on white. How do you explain to people that you care about, that despite years of “the evidence of the street,” that you will never be suspicious or raise your children to be suspicious of somebody just because of their skin color. They look at you and say, “See, you are just being naive” and there’s some truth to it.


While I always clung to my father’s sense of reasonableness I also grew more cynical, as it seemed clear that the transcendent Civil Rights Movement leaders had been martyred only to be replaced by the lesser angels of victimhood and divisiveness who confirmed intolerant people’s worst assumptions about race, work ethic, diversity, intelligence and entitlement. People on both sides of the divide could then say knowingly, “See, nothing really changes.” I must confess that I had no reason to expect that a standard bearer of more enlightened race relations would ever rise again to articulate a message to the world that my immediate family had already internalized. The best that I could hope for was to stand on my own lessons and pass them to my children. So I’ve always felt a measure of pride, that we chose to live in a city where we are just one more “minority” in a multi-cultural pot of minorities, that my boys go to school with children of different and mixed races, that they bring friends of all races into our home, that we’ve been governed by three African American mayors and that in one important way, we’ve personally evolved beyond the experiences of the previous generation. My sons don’t see “color” in the same way that I did. They see racial prejudice, if they think about it at all, as a historical artifact and not something they’ve had to live with and confront.


What happened to our nation last night will teach the world what I learned as a boy of twelve. Families at dinner tables will be compelled by the evidence of their own eyes, to have new conversations and come to new conclusions. Centuries of “learned behavior” will be gradually unlearned and replaced by new beliefs. I have always held that America is the world’s greatest laboratory of change. Like the lessons of tolerance that my family learned, we’ve had scant evidence and scant reason to be optimistic about “the experiment” since the 60’s, but a mere 40+ years later, Barack has burst on to the world stage and has blazed trails, not of racial entitlement, but of human entitlement. He had plenty of opportunities at many turns during this campaign, to play “the race card” and chose not to. I doubt he ever will. Thanks to him, the concept of a “race card” became outdated last night and will pass in less than a generation into historical artifact.


John McCain called Barack, “MY PRESIDENT.” That is perhaps the first maverick thing that I’ve heard him say of late that I completely endorse. For decades, I have not been able to say those words with any sense of pride of ownership. Rather, I was more inclined to endorse Michelle Obama’s view of not always being proud of our country. If anything; I’d thought she’d understated the case. I have been telling Bennett, apologizing really, that my generation which had started with such starry-eyed idealism had capitulated so utterly. That is was going to be up to him and his generation to get pissed and pick up the mantle of activism that we’d dropped.


Kate, Char, K I thought of your beautiful mixed race daughters, your multinational sons and our multi-ethnic sons last night when my president ”used his words” to envisioned a world a hundred years from now. I held my breath. I got chills down my spine and dewy eyed for he’d conjured something that hadn’t existed the night before.


People have criticized Barack for being a man of words, but as leaders, parents and citizens, we use our words as evidence of ideas, intent and deeds that extend the thread of optimism, tentatively, one person, one family, at a time. In my life, optimism has been more often been based on a contrarian act of faith than evidence of durable human progress. But it really happened and it happened here and it happened last night. And I own a piece of it!


Today I am proud beyond measure to be an American and a citizen of the world. The generational compact of a better world passable to the children has never seemed more real. Barring cryogenic preservation, even the youngest of my fellow Boomers will not see the America of the 22nd Century, but we have set its stage so that Barack’s children and our children will. The idealism of the young is a precious and wonderful thing, to be protected and nurtured, but I’d argue that the reawakened idealism of the middle-aged is even more precious, for it is rare and most difficult to rekindle.


So cool.


rmw





From: Charlotte
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 11:20 AM
To: 'Donohue, Kate'
Subject: RE: Obama


This is a very touching and heartfelt piece, Kate! I am taking the opportunity to forward it to some of my friends and family……….thank you for sharing it!


I will never forget the camaraderie and sense of hope for the USA that I experienced working for weeks at the phone banks in the Obama HQ in Philly! Aside from being elated and I feel so sentimental that last night the greatness of the US of A was eventually demonstrated to the World after 8 years of ‘living in the dark ages’! As you say Kate, many young people will proceed through their lives with their idealism intact and I pray their will not be reason for this to cease! The look in many people’s eyes at Grant Park last night made me feel they were focused on a Messiah and at times I felt he was! Yes, I do believe Obama is intelligent and thoughtful enough to choose wise advisors to help him begin to solve some of our problems and ,as he himself mentioned, he will not be able to do so in 4 years, maybe not even 8 but I am convinced he will serve us and the nation to the best of his ability in a selfless and wise way!


FYI – Kenya declared a day of holiday in order to hold feasts to celebrate the victory of their ‘favourite son’! I was so tearful that neither his father, mother or grandmother could be on that stage with him and Michelle’s family last night!


Many warm thoughts to you all,


Char





From: Donohue, Kate
Sent: 05 November 2008 10:04
To: Donohue, Kate
Subject: Obama


Bevan was a flying pig for Halloween and I think that maybe this is the year that pigs really can fly -- last week the Phillies won the World Series and yesterday the United States elected its first African American President.


I volunteered as a poll watcher at a polling location in N Philly near Temple Univ yesterday. I saw so many young people voting for the first time, so excited, so hopeful. They cannot fully appreciate how remarkable this election was, and perhaps that is a good thing. These young people will go forward in life with their idealism intact, convinced that their vote counts and that nothing is impossible. This is just what our nation needs right now.


I shared a hug and misty eyes with a woman as she left the voting booth saying she never thought she would see the day… I witnessed a very frail gentleman arrive just before the polls closed (assisted by a young Obama campaign volunteer). He had been released from the hospital Monday, but wanted so much to vote. Truly it was an historic election.


While it feels like victory, the battle has just begun. President Obama will need all the prayers that we can send, and all the support that we can provide, to govern this country. Let’s hope that he has the wisdom, and that we have the courage, to resolve some of our problems…


k

Tuesday, September 2, 2008

Economic View--Dem's Better Bet for Economy

Even if:
  • You don’t believe that the Bush administration deliberately lied and then thoroughly screwed the pooch in Iraq from the start.
  • You don’t believe that there’s been an 8 year run up of graft and corruption as the administration guts the federal bureaucracy and turns public works into private profit for its donors.
  • You’re a Halliburton stock owner.
  • You don’t feel the election should be a referendum on the worst presidency in our nation’s history.
  • You like the rightwing social engineering and loss of privacy rights over the past 8 years.
  • You don’t mind that science takes a back seat to politics in Republican policymaking.
  • You don’t mind the Supreme Court being stacked with social conservatives.
  • You don’t mind that our allies think we’ve become a nation of isolationist, jingoistic, trigger happy, bible thumping, hypocritical Joe Sixpacks.
  • You don’t feel the current economic downturn is a direct result of failed national and international economic policies and misplaced tax incentives.
  • You don’t feel oil company profits are obscene and based on an international cabal that pollutes the planet and stymies home-grown innovation and alternative sources of energy.
  • You think offshore drilling won’t ever threaten the delicate ecosystem of our coastline and will bring back the era of $1/gallon gasoline.
  • You think “the war on terror” as defined by Bush is more important than redirecting those trillions into our crumbling infrastructure.
  • You're gullible enough to consider Mrs. Palin as a worthy member of the sisterhood of traveling pantsuits.
  • You don’t believe social conservatives consistently preach moral, ethical and social standards they or their families don’t live up to.
  • You think the gogo Governor of the reindeer state would make a better second in command or commander in chief than the scrapper from Scranton. So much for experience being the deciding factor.
  • You think John McCain (who is older than the gipper was) will stay awake, alive and healthy as a horse for the next 4 years.
  • Unlike the US Constitution, you feel military service and/or being a POW is a prerequisite and defacto ticket to the White House.
  • You make less than $5,000,000 and own less than 7 houses.
  • But most of all, even if you’re in the 95th income Percentile, (>$180,000).

The numbers don’t lie.

It is OUR economy and it can't take another 8 years of "stupid." Just think of your wallet too. It will love you more if you vote Dem in Novem. So, ignore my rant with impunity, but ignore this NY Times business post at your own peril, then go vote against the trickle down economic theories that have been about as effective as Soviet communism. America will thank you.

Tuesday, July 22, 2008

Walking Man 1


I'm a writer, which immediately qualifies me as the most sedentary of schleppers. Six years ago my lack of mobility, love of food and thickening waistline earned me a diagnosis of diabetes, the American Lifestyle Disease. Having two adult onset diabetic parents with failing health and a grandmother who died of the disease, I could hardly claim ignorance about the longterm consequences of the disease. I took a contrarian view. I took my diagnosis as a wakeup call and thus my goal with the help of a good doc, was to create gradual, sustainable and significant change in those aspects of my lifestyle that were and are risk factors. Serious walking began simply as an attempt to fold daily errands, stress reduction and vigorous exercise into my otherwise deskbound day. My Walkable City, Philadelphia, rewarded my efforts and spread its bounty before me.

The recent buzz about urban walkability ratings has jump-started this blogline, which up to now has existed only in my head (and feet). I haven’t figured out how to walk and write at the same time, but I’ve come close.

Nearly every day at 5:00, my eight year old son and I step out our front door and cross two busy streets. We’re off to collect Mom who works at the University of PA, Presbyterian Hospital 2.5 miles from our house. The boy and I both have our MP3 players plugged in and are enjoying our own private soundtracks. Mine has about 2000 songs. I don’t know if I’ll be listening to Leonard Cohen, Arvo Paart or Deep Purple. The random surprise of shuffle selection is the joy of it. Perhaps it fits that I also find the jangling hustle bustle of the city soothing. I’ve plugged in my musician-quality Shure E-4c earbuds, which when properly inserted in the ear canal, immediately knock out about 70% of the ambient noise while allowing me to enjoy the full tonal range of my music without cranking it.

Some folks think I’m irresponsible or shutting myself off from the world, but I’ll tell you it’s bliss. A bus rumbles by and I do hear it, but at quarter strength. Somewhere, a wailing fire engine closes in but I feel none of the instinctual panic you experience in your chest as the decibels build to a throbbing scream in your head. I live in the city. I don’t need any more noise. I have a choice about what goes in my ears, soundwise. It’s incredibly liberating. But this splendid aural isolation comes at a modest cost of increased visual acuity. “Look both ways before you cross the street. Then look again.” Mom said it and well into my second half century, these are good words to live by. The boy and I hold hands and communicate with gestures and hand signals. His stride is two steps to my one, but his pace is flowing and easy, a sort of skipping run. He enjoys this as much as I do. We fall quickly into a rhythm. I shift hands with him, to keep him on “the inside,” my body shielding his from oncoming traffic of any sort.

I share my own, more cautionary version of Mom’s bromide with both my boys. “Assume the people flying past you in their cars are psychos or idiots and can lose control of their cars in a split second. Pay attention and live.” A tad dramatic perhaps, but a little paranoia is healthy when it comes to navigating urban byways.

At this point, if I were just walking for pleasure, I'd have all kinds of choices. I’m on one of dozens of access points to the world's largest urban park. I can travel north or south along the Schuylkill River, a well-used recreational waterscape, where Ben Franklin himself picnicked and frolicked with his lady admirers. I could follow the river away from or directly into the leftbank heart of the city. Or I can climb the hill behind the Art Museum which winds through a Victorian walker's garden with its gazebo and trails, running back up to the museum which occupies the site of the Philadelphia Waterworks, the nation's first urban waterworks, the architectural and scientific marvel and travel destination of the 18th century. Heading west, I then cross the Spring Garden Street bridge, with its commanding northward view of the river, the museum and the waterworks, all which when seen by sunset, recall the colors of Sienna. The southward view is dominated by my favorite view of the Philadelphia skyline.

This may be a bit of hometown hubris, but frankly I'm surprised that Philadelphia ranks lower than New York and San Fran. in walkability. Maybe I and the study's authors have different definitions of walkability. I've been telling people for years that this is the most walkable city in the country and I stand by it. I've visited and walked them all, with the exception of Portland. The reasons for my preference are myriad. First of all, walking for me is a 20-30 mile per week activity. I average about 5 miles per hour. Try maintaining that pace in NYC and not slowing, dodging or colliding with other pedestrians. Hey you, I’m walkin’ here!

Don’t get me wrong. I love New York, love walking in it, eating in it, doing business or just having fun in it. New York is many bigger and better things, but more walkable than Philadelphia, it is not. To me, it boils down to modulation. New York’s skyline is so straight up and down, so constricted that even the parks and open spaces feel hemmed in. Not so here. Here the skyline offers, well, sky, room to breathe. Here a building can be appreciated, in context, like Cesar Pelli’s changeable magnificent Cira Center which maintains a dynamic ever-shifting dialogue with earth and sky. In New York it would be compressed into the same space with a dozen other buildings, all just as magnificent perhaps, but battling each other for eye-space, lost to their own scale. Here Cira and I have room to breath, to interact. So I greet it every day. It talks back to me. I feel we have a relationship.

Like many walkable urban neighborhoods, there are dozens of charming restaurants and shops less than mile from my doorstep. But here, Billy Penn’s rigorous, revolutionary gridwork of streets means that even the first time (walking) visitor stands little chance of getting lost. Several dramatic diagonal avenues, former farmer’s market pikes, radiate into or out of the city, (depending on your perspective), the most notable of these is the Benjamin Franklin Parkway, which in a few years, will, I predict, come to resemble Barcelona’s Las Ramblas in scale, grandeur and pedestrian amenities. Though its lights aren’t the most pedestrian-friendly, the BFP makes City Hall an easy 20 minute destination from my home in Fairmount. Philadelphia’s terrain is neither completely flat like Chi town’s, yet not so demanding that one needs bionic calves to handle the ascensions and declensions of say San Fran.

Not that my calves can’t handle the Golden City, thank you, it’s just that again, maintaining a sustainable pace is critical to my definition of walkability and walking as exercise. So is the aesthetic experience of it, the sense of variable, visual modulation, the confluence of greenery, open sky, open ground, dramatic vistas, urban structures and urban cultural amenities. In addition, Philadelphia has what few other of America's most walkable cities have and that is arguably the most extensive historical pedigree in the country, little gems of which constantly reveal themselves with little effort on the part of the observant walker. I imagine a future which I long for, but will probably never see, of walking these fair streets and byways, unperturbed by the infernal combustion machines that dominate the roads—for now.

Don’t get me wrong. I have a late model Toyota Avalon that I love and maintain like some guys pamper their sportier rides. I’ve put all of 10,000 miles on a year on it. I have already, by lifestyle and preference, reduced my “carbon footprint.” My only problem is when I have to suck in some of yours.

On the Spring Garden Street Bridge, we hold our breath to inhale a bit less of the blue gray sulfurous spew coming from a particularly noxious SUV with a failing transmission. Will the vehicle even make its destination? Do I know something that the driver doesn’t?

Perhaps not, but I do have a theory. It came to me on the Spring Garden Street Bridge while watching drivers jockeying to make the turn onto the Expressway down ramp. I’ve come to believe that learning to drive a car was the first step to the emotional distancing that allowed Air force pilots to carpet bomb entire villages in Vietnam, then blithely suck down cold beers in Saigon officers’ clubs an hour later. Conversely keeping feet on the street keeps you connected in ways too intimate for some people to handle. The more machine you put between yourself and your own transport, the more distanced you are. The boy and I stand with a commanding view of the Schuylkill Expressway, watching the spasmodic progress of what I call the red snake and its opposing cousin, the white snake. It’s hard to imagine all the individuals in all those cars as singular entities rather than just segments of the snakes.

Imagine all this, without cars, I tell my son. He’s heard it before. The power and the clarity of the idea make us pause. Perhaps it’s just the fumes. I heard today that GM’s quarterly earning statement had plunged. Corporate spokespeople said and I quote, they were “caught offguard by declining sales and Americans’ efforts to conserve fuel by buying smaller and fewer vehicles.” Caught offguard???? It must be a real talent to say something like that and not look incredibly stupid doing so. Then again, I guess if you manufacture Hummers, there’s lot about sustainable transportation choices that will catch you offguard. It’s just like the 70’s, just 30 years later.

BTW, I've been off diabetes meds for over a year and have managed my disease into remission by diet and exercise alone. I've lost 60 pounds and all the aches and pains that I used to get in my knees and legs are gone. I have, in my own opinion at least, America's most walkable city to thank. Sign me, the Philadelphia Walking Man

Wednesday, January 23, 2008

Think Different

My son’s recent acceptance at the premiere creative and performance arts high school in Philadelphia inspired this look back down the path that brought us here. This is our story, but I don’t think it’s entirely unique by any means. For good or not, the world is a lot more complex than when we were kids and just went to the reliable neighborhood primary school and high school. For the better part of B’s academic career we paid 5 figure tuitions and battled with a hidebound administration (in his old school) that didn’t have a clue as to how to handle kids like B who are challenged by traditional academics. For years, they ratcheted up a case for warehousing our talented son in even more expensive suburban “special needs schools” that would have taxed our already strained budget and meant hours of grinding commute time each day. It wasn’t just a matter of finances and lifestyle. There were and are deeper principles at stake, namely, what rights we as consumers of the “educational product” are entitled to.

Three main federal laws apply to public schools. These are the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Section 504), and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), passed in 1990. Though the public schools are the most strained and underfunded of all public institutions, they are required to educate every kid to the standards of the state. They may not be able to get the funds they need for more than basic programs, but they are mandated to take on all comers unless they pose a hazard to the school and even then, they are required to accommodate as best they can.

What legal protections exist for private school students? The answer is virtually none. Unless they accept federal funds, private schools are kinda like the Boy Scouts. You have the right to pay the tuition. They have carte blanche to discriminate or select as they see fit. You have the right to suck it up and move on if they feel your kid isn’t a “good fit.”

For 5 years, we were told that B’s “differences” put him in “academic jeopardy” and made him incompatible with the school he was enrolled in. They implied that we were less than intelligent or responsible parents if we didn’t understand this. The other argument, the most specious in my opinion, was that with their 15/1 student teacher ratio, learning specialists, state-of-the-art libraries, media labs and rich endowment, that this poor beleaguered institution wasn’t “set up” to meet the educational demands of special needs kids. That it wouldn’t be fair to the other children. When I tell this to public school educators, they roll their eyes and laugh derisively. Still, most private school parents when confronted with the case against their child’s continued inclusion swallow their disappointment, take the hint and pull their kids out. Who can blame them? But we didn’t do this. Why? Because we understand our son and we saw the flipside far better than they did.

The flipside was that B loved his school. He was fortunate to be mentored by a handful of inspired teachers (mostly in the arts) who “got him” and we credit these creative educators for their independent role in his success. From his perspective, his experience was far more positive than negative. He worked very hard, learned a lot, had fun, had a flawless behavior record and maintained an overall 3.0 GPA. He and we cherished the close society of his friends, most of whom he’s known since kindergarten.

We count as one of our greatest successes that we were able to mitigate the pressure so that he was largely unaware of it. He never knew that his former academic advisor, a horrid little witch of a teacher who stood over him in her own words “for ten minutes, timing him with a stopwatch while he fumbled to open his locker” was making a value judgment against him. He never knew about the stunningly arrogant music teacher who wrote that B “lacked the mental ability” to focus on his course. He never met the abrasive “school psychologist” whose opinions the administrators leaned so heavily on, though she was in fact was unqualified to evaluate him because she was only a sociologist by credential. Even so, judging from her age and backward attitudes, it’s likely that said educational credentials were gained some time before the Sputnik launch. From my discussions with other parents, it became clear that her sole raison d’être at the school was to weed out the “different ones.” For four years, we sat across the table from this hatchet woman until I put my foot down and refused any meeting that she attended. We got so much more done without her.

Believe you me, I came to those meetings with much more than parental emotions in tow. I presented research results on the efficacy of mainstreaming mildly learning challenged kids. I developed an individualized education plan with help and ideas from educator siblings and friends. Kara and I read and worked at times on a daily basis with the teachers we knew we could count on to track B’s progress and challenges. We also spent several European vacations worth of funds on private tutors, private evaluators and private testing because the private school “psychologist” convinced us that we wouldn’t find adequate resources in the public sector.

Yet every year, for four years, it was as if the private school had purged our son’s details from their institutional memory banks. Every year, we started afresh at an end-of-first term meeting in which B’s academic challenges were detailed with dire predictions about his ability to make the grade and manage emotionally. Always reactive – never proactive. Every year, we’d all buckle down, engage the accommodations and B’s grades would rise across the board. Several times every year, I’d do a reality check and ask him if he was happy with his school. Every year he said he loved it and was willing to do the work to stay there. With that his mother and I vowed he could go there as long as he wanted. And that is the reason, more than any other that we dug our heels in. In the process, we learned new definitions for perseverance, academic success and hard work. These are lessons they don’t teach you in school, lessons learned from our own son.

We worked tirelessly within the system. We challenged, lobbied and cajoled the people on the other end of the table. We tested B privately when they said we needed to. We visited the special needs schools we knew we couldn’t afford. We paid for expensive tutoring. But we were prepared to go further, much, much further. By this, I mean the following. I reasoned that if the private school in using public school bussing was in fact accepting federal aid directly or indirectly, that one or more of the federal or state mandated inclusiveness statutes might apply to them. I was one phone call away from testing that assumption and discovering if we could turn this tiny bit of leverage into a court case to test our rights. I guess we’re all fortunate that it never got that far.

The turning point came in late 2006, 7th grade, when I sat in the middle school director’s office and she told me that she had “no vested interest in helping B enroll in any other high school than their own.” This was the very same administrator who in this and many prior meetings had told us that B was not ideally suited to her school. I told her that I was grateful for her candor (chillingly Catch 22 though it was). That night Kara and I went into emergency session. The open enrollment period for out of neighborhood public schools had lapsed three months prior, but through an incredible stroke of luck or vigilance, I learned that our neighborhood association was holding a “Schools Night.” So, on that raw, rain-soaked December night, we buttonholed a Philadelphia School District official who listened sympathetically to (a much abbreviated version of) our tale and committed to working with us. I don’t know what strings she pulled if any, but through her ministrations, we were able to enroll B in the highly-sought-after William Meredith School, where for the first time, school administrators worked in concert with us, rather than at odds. Words hardly express what a revelation and relief it has been, but I can tell you that our experience this school year has turned all the private school “experts’” stereotypes about the public sector on their ear.

For many years, we’d been asked why we chose this uphill path for so long, rather than accept the recommendations of “the experts.” The answer was simple. The experts, in this case were wrong and short-sighted. If a child is an artist/scholar, musician/scholar, athlete/scholar, entrepreneur/scholar or a computer whiz/scholar or is gifted or challenged in any way that diverges from the scholastic norm, then chances are that the experts just don’t get them. Advocating for your child and charting the right course is then left to entirely to parents and guardians who have to make difficult, incredibly important decisions, with little guidance from the traditional academic community. I think they expect you to fail. In fact, I think they rely on it. I look forward to the day when the academic communities in private and in public schools learn to truly embrace inclusiveness and scholastic diversity. In B’s old private school, which touts its diversity, it became clear that they really meant inclusiveness and diversity in a very specific, narrow range. We found it curious that this diversity never included a single blind, deaf or physically disabled kid. Some day, some family with a fire in its collective belly is going to take on a private school in a court of law and challenge and prevail on just these issues.

It makes you wonder why private schools, while selling their inclusiveness, apply it with such aggressive selectivity. Perhaps that too is a marketing decision, as if word got out that a mainstream private school truly caters to special needs they might be inundated with applications from less “desirable” applicants. Is it overly cynical to suggest that the marketing image of inclusiveness trumps the reality of inclusiveness?

We’ve also learned that different sectors have vastly different understandings of what it means to be “special needs.” This year, Kara and I have seen a stark contrast between what “special needs” means in private schools versus public schools. If the Philadelphia Inquirer is to believed, In the public schools sadly, “special needs” is often synonymous with disruption and discipline problems. It seems unlikely that B, if he’d been enrolled in a public school from the start, would have ever been flagged for his mild but real special learning needs. In private schools, special needs means everybody who does not fit within their narrow beam. Both are failed models.

My take is that ALL OF US, all learners have “special needs.” If you take that statement to its logical conclusion, it means up-ending the cookie cutter approach to education and truly addressing the special needs of every individual, whatever their abilities and talents. You only have to look at U.S. science, math and literacy test comparisons with other advanced cultures to see that the traditional American model is failing even the traditional scholars. The failure is wide and systemic, a failure in particular, of our baby boomer generation, who may have started out “thinking different” but quickly lapsed into familiar rubrics perhaps because we are distracted by the political exigencies of four decades of fruitless, arrogant petroleum cowboy diplomacy. I’m waiting for a politician, a presidential candidate to point this out and then detail the vision for overhauling both our education infrastructure and our roads and bridges. Republican, Democrat or Independent, that’s the person who will get my zealous support. I’m not holding my breath. I’ve not seen any of the current field with the courage, honesty or zealotry to tackle these, the truly most important infrastructure issues we face as we pass on our legacy to the next generation.

From my perspective in the adult e-learning business, I sense that an educational revolution is at hand. There are technology and training solutions coming down the pike that will make fundamental differences. Communications tools are coming to the forefront that are creating economically viable, scalable, customized lifelong education for everybody who needs it. Embracing “universal special needs” will drive a true revolution in education. But first, I think it will involve an overhaul in the base premise, in leadership, in thinking, in educational modeling. God, I hope it happens soon. Two hundred years ago, a teenager like B would have left a traditional academic environment and been engaged as an apprentice by a master artist or craftsman. It’s clear that something was lost when our culture shifted from the apprentice/mentor model to the industrial age model of education where centuries later, we’re still stuck. Perhaps five years from now, parents and students will have more choices, more information and more flexible and creative solutions from the academic world. By that point, the Weiss family will be embroiled in the next great challenge of engaging a higher education system that seems to have largely distanced itself from its legacy commitment to the learning needs of the middle class.

Plenty of parents and students face issues similar to ours. Our story has a happy ending so far. At the end of a lot of hard work, independent research and tireless advocacy, our talented artist/scholar will receive the academic training and creative mentoring that he merits. Looking back on our experiences, we can find no regrets, no false steps or do-overs. Well, maybe we could have saved several thousand bucks, had we learned sooner to recognize and distrust the most patently self-serving advice we were given. Ours is the luck born of hard work. If there is a single lesson to be distilled from our experience, it’s that when it comes to education, “challenging authority” and “thinking different” aren’t just shopworn boomer bromides, but life skills that we and our children will need to succeed in a world that no longer regards us as the last word. How can America regain its academic pre-eminence? Engaging a concept like universal special needs might just be the answer.

Thursday, November 29, 2007

E-books not near ready for prime time:

-@v@- wrote:

Story: Will-e-books-ever-be-a-best-seller?

Amazon and Sony better hope Apple doesn't show up in this space, because the one tipping point feature that trumps price, killer "app-titude" or usability, i.e., “design cool" just ain't there. No eye appeal in either e-book package. These things are both butt ugly; they scream prototype even though they aren't.



Nobody reads 170 books at one time, so who cares, capacity is a non-starter at this point. Add to which they're way out of the price range of the one market they make the most sense for, the poor beleaguered students who have to cart dozens of monster textbooks around in their groaning backpacks. If my kids could replace all their textbooks with the one device they plug into their school's server or the net, I'd jump just to save them the backstrain and myself the doctors’ bills. But for now, fuggedaboudit!

Back to the drawing board kids, but don't take too long. Mark this. Apple will sit out a couple of cycles, then jump in with a sexy, far prettier face, toss in some of the cool interface doodads they do so well and we will all go oooh and aaah and cue up overnight at our nearest Apple Stores to buy the first ones.. Then they'll further solidify their market by giving them away to public schools along with Itunes textbook downloads and Steve Jobs will finally and irrevocably become William Randolph Hearst.

Tuesday, September 4, 2007

The Art Palace In My Front Yard

Inga Saffron is the architecture critic for the Philadelphia Inquirer. While I find that on a whole that the quality of reportage, particularly international reportage has plummetted after the Inky was taken over by Philadelphia Media Holdings and its dark lord, Brian Tierney, Ms. Saffron's star remains undimmed. Ms. Saffron through her Changing Skylines column does what a big city daily should do, shed light and occasional heat on issues that affect urban life. Now as far as architecture goes, the closest thing to an education that I ever got was to hang out and get wasted with architect friends. That is until I made Ms. Saffron's article a weekly "must read" and began to take a proprietary interest in the skyline of my adopted City of Brotherly Love.




This particular piece of skyline is right out my front door and if proximity confers some sense of entitlement or ownership, then her most recent review, Art Palace is Right Fit with Philadelphia is a perfect fit for me.



My architect friends agree that in Ms. Saffron, that Philly has a worldclass observer of public spaces. As people who have lived with the Fidelity/Reliance cum Perelman for 23 years, Mrs. W and I have some history with the building and on the whole are thrilled with what it has become. Given that this structure is the second home of one of the nation’s premiere museums, it is right to hold it to a higher standard.

I must admit that when I first saw the concrete block of the new addition, I was dismayed. I imagined that somewhere, a building materials order got flummoxed and a suburban Walmart got our Perelman order and we got theirs. (Note the liberal use possessives.) But humble concrete can be a tabula rasa and when I saw the metal grid on the 25th street side with the climbing flowering vines, I had a little aha moment and walked away with a smile on my face.

I had another even more intense aesthetic experience after the construction barriers, trailers and fencing were cleared away to reveal a broadened gleaming pedestrian expanse along the Fairmount-PA Ave intersection. Because of its scale and lighting it is serving as a lively, impromptu community hot spot, where on one particular mid-summer evening, while chatting up the museum’s director of housekeeping, a neighbor, I observed Art Museum Director Anne d'Harnoncourt and a neighborhood mom confer on dog training strategies. This is a nexus where we neighbors regularly connect in little Jane Jacobian moments on our way to and from our errands and walks.

There is one sore spot on this lovely walkway and perhaps it takes a neighbor with a couple decades of walkby experience to point it out. Our new neighbors should know that in my 20+ years of observing, nothing has ever flourished in the little strip of earth that parallels the “moat” wall. The previous owners planted boxwoods which, try as they might, through multiple replantings, always withered after a couple of seasons. The same pretty vines that seem so happy on the 25th Street side are dying wretched deaths in that parched little strip of cursed earth along PA Avenue.

Most folks I talk to agree that the work of the landscapers has fallen far short of expectations. Even the streetside lot on 26th, which is a quantum improvement in terms of eye appeal, was poorly executed when it came to laying down an appropriate soil base and proper planting. One day it was a bare construction trash strewn network of pits and trenches. The next day it was planted. The plants there now struggle and show the ill-effects of rushed, slipshod planting techniques. Several cute little rhododendrons have already succumbed. We’re also a bit perplexed that the lovely honey locust and black locusts that were planted along 25th, Fairmount and PA Ave were not extended back along the Meredith St. expanse of the Perelman. What, just because it doesn’t face the more trafficked avenues, it isn’t worthy of modest finishing touches? The museum needs to call its landscapers on the carpet to remedy these oversights. What they’ve done, or more to the point, what they haven’t done, is unworthy of this public space.

The most glaring oversight is the “temporary” PECO pole that furnished power to the construction machines, but now stands, an ugly sore digit, disconnected from the grid and ready to be extracted. But it hasn’t been and nobody can tell me when it will be. I buttonholed the project manager and he asked me if I had any pull with PECO and we both laughed at the irony in his question. Perhaps Ms. d'Harnoncourt herself should get on the phone and work her way up the electric utility’s chain until this sore tooth is yanked. If you google my address, you’ll see why this particular piece of unfinished business is most galling to us. Before the construction, we had a beautiful, unobstructed view of the northwest face of the museum proper and its sycamores. The lot used to be a blacktop sea of cars, parked two or three to the space. We now have a lovely view of the locust trees and shrubbery of the lot. On the whole, a vast improvement. Then standing smack in the middle of our transom window is this bare ugly projection which resembles nothing so much as a rudely upthrust Brobdingnagian middle finger. It is a visual insult that we endured while it was needed and as it no longer serves any purpose, it has to go.

Finally, I chatted up Inky staff shutterbug Michael Bryant when he was taking his photos in preparation for Inga's article. His 7th picture (on the philly.com site) shows the interior view of the ventilation stack and I agree with Ms. Saffron's assertion that it is butt ugly and inexcusable. Imagine in its absence, the light and the view of that pretty brick, tree and sun-dappled piece of 25th St. looking out or the lovely view of the museum’s atrium looking in. It could have been a lively and enduring visual comment on how a cultural landmark and its resident neighbors interact and instead it looks like an architectural mooning (and I’m not talking astronomy) to the genial neighborhood that has for the most part, endured the three years of construction with patience and good grace. The architect had the Perelman's huge interior space to work with that would have been invisible from the street. What WAS he thinking?


Even more inexplicable and you can see it from Mr. Bryant’s photo, are the uneven flashing, the ladder and rag, (if that’s what these are) sticking up from the top. Walking up 25th St. one eerie moonlight night, the glint of the ladder and the rag flapping in the wind caught my eye and sent a chill down my spine. I had to stop and stare down this grim trompe-l'Å“il for several minutes because it looked for all the world like the malevolent scarecrow in Dennis Potter’s The Singing Detective. (It was a lot darker and creepier then, trust me.)

I can’t claim to always understand art, but I sometimes wonder if I understand architecture even less.

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

God's Scariest Little Army

B and I watched the movie Jesus Camp last Friday. He wanted me to record (ahem, I mean “time shift") it so that we could watch it again but I’d already returned it. So I put it in my Netflix queue and browsed some of the 624 flixters reviews of the movie. Yes, 624. It has to be a record. Obviously this doc really hit a legion of hot-buttons and one or two of my own, so it is the subject of today’s cultural vulturalism.

I found the reviews by the people who claim to be Fundamentalist or Evangelical Christians the most interesting and even unpredictable. One cautioned against letting children watch such potent material. I believe that this is a film parents should watch with kids and be prepared to spend hours discussing. Mine was vocally angry through most of it; his outrage at both the arrogance and manipulation of the budding televangelists were dead on.

He saved particular scorn for the poodle-coiffed, pied piper Becky Fisher and his BS detector pegged each time he recognized the way she used accusation, guilt and catharsis as tactics to break down her impressionable charges or her fast, easy dismissal of young people’s diversity and freedom of thought. I watched, without further comment, because I wanted to hear my son's perceptions uncolored by my own. I only broke my silence twice. The first time to answer his question, “Who are these enemies she’s talking about? I responded, me, you—anybody who doesn’t believe as they do.


I also felt inclined to point out Ted Haggard's sordid history/future after this film was edited. In light of his scandalous "fall from grace" the haggard one’s smarmy on-camera muggings and fatuous protest to the filmmakers seem particularly camp and grotesque, yet strangely reassuring. The dude was high on more than Jesus. Ted was the only person who appeared in the doc whose comportment and convictions seemed insincere from the first note. Gosh, how surprising. The other subjects, scary as we found them, do seem to be without artifice, while Mr. Walk Both Ways Haggard clearly loved his closeup above all.
Pride goeth before destruction and a haughty spirit before a fall.
Proverbs 16:18


Most gratifying for a parent, was my son's shrewd connection of all the military paraphenalia so rapturously embraced by these little soldiers of Christ and how their brand of fundamentalism was as raw and intolerant as anything coming out of the madrases of Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. These little crusaders, who are no doubt well-coached to say so, claim that they are spiritual warriors, but in their combat fatigues, fascist-stiff-armed salutes, camouflage war paint and martial kick/punch dancing, seemed less about the beatitudes and more ready to strap on explosives and meet Jesus head on. Body language speaks volumes. So do words.

“There are two types of people – those who love Jesus and those who don’t."

Why would anybody want to make that distinction? Am I reading too much into this to believe that this is exactly the sort of stark duality that sets up two classes of people? Jews. Aryans. Heteros. Homos. Believers. Infidels. Intolerance is always served up two scoops at a time.

Equally chilling was the little girl who approached a couple of African American gentlemen and asked one of them, with barely a how’d do, if he thought he was going to heaven. When the puzzled man answered in the affirmative, she shot back quizzically, “Are you sure?”

Afterwards, she remarked to a friend, “I think he was a Muslim.”

As I said earlier, I was most interested in the responses from the Christian reviewers who expressed ‘that these people are not like us.’ It gives me some comfort to take them at their word, but I would caution them, as I do my moderate Muslim and Jewish friends, that the radical proselytizers and zealots have so thoroughly stolen their show that perhaps they bear some responsibility for rebalancing the scales. Jesus Camp shows just how far all moderates have to go to rebalance the equation of democracy and civil discourse in this country. B made the connection between this film and Stanley Kramer’s glorious Judgment at Nuremberg, which we watched about a month ago. I offered that both films showed that while philosophies of intolerance may begin with monsters, they can only be perpetuated by the bourgeois, respectable, ordinary folks.

As the credits rolled, I turned to my son and quoted Mr. Jefferson’s admonition that “The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." He asked me to explain and I told him that this was his generation, that it's clear that the bright, articulate young people he saw in this film are not going to be satisfied preaching on street corners and megachurches, but will march their self-righteous intolerance into the halls of government and when they gain power, will trample on your civil liberties in the name of salvation and persecute anybody they believe to be ungodly. Though people of my generation have created these little mullahs, it will be people of his generation that would have to confront them.

Some of these sparkly eyed little charmers will grow haggard on pharmaceuticals and the temptations of alternative lifestyles. Some of the brightest will succumb to the relentlessly moderating influence of education. But enough will get through the grid that you better be ready, I advised, with activism, knowledge, arguments and convictions just as compelling as theirs. If your generation isn’t up to it, you might end up living in a red white and blue Iranish theocracy and watching your own children say the Christian Pledge of Allegiance in compulsory Jesus Camps. We grew up checking for Reds under our beds. I’m nostalgic for them. Ms. Fisher’s little morality squad is much scarier.

Not that I wasn’t raised with some pretty traditional values--particularly regarding pledging allegiance. The nuns at St. Ursula told us that for an American to pledge allegiance to any but the American flag is treason. Simplistic, but the lesson stuck.

We’re renting Jesus Camp again, for more family viewing and discussion and I would encourage parents of all faiths to not to try to protect their children from such controversial viewing, but encourage it, the better to help their kids become critical thinkers.

The documentary style is as clean and unbiased as anything I’ve ever seen or studied and I thought the choice of Mike Papantonio to provide commentary and counterpoint was particularly well made. Jesus Camp opens a window on a world that people of moderate leanings would rather disavow. People of faith, be they Christians, Muslims or Jews, hurry to distance themselves from such zealotry, but if Jesus Camp teaches anything, it is that silent complicity in such radicalism is like ink in water. It spreads so quickly that before we know it, we’re all stained. The Net says that Jesus Camp has been shut down by its founder in the interest of protecting her young charges. I say this is a hydra, with more heads than you can possibly imagine.

Keep the faith.

-@V@-

Tuesday, May 22, 2007

Skating on the Superficial

Rescuing Masculinity for What It's Worth

I’m reading The Road with my 13 year old. We’re about two-thirds through it and I pretty much know how it’s going to end. My boy snuck a look at the ending and he says he also knows the outcome. But we press on—a chapter a night. There’s not a lot of plot, suspense or character arc here. This doesn’t bother me. Maybe it deserves a Pulitzer, maybe not. Maybe this isn’t the best book I’ve read, not even this year, but I’m glad to be reading it and glad to be reading it with my son. I certainly don’t think it deserved the round pounding it received from the Inky’s book critic.

I had my boy read the withering review to me early last week and I was kinda surprised when young Master W. agreed with Mr. Wilson’s critique of McCarthy’s narrative conventions, but not with his overall assessment of the book. Sure, of the short list of people who did it both first and best, McCarthy will never out-hem Hemingway, or fitz Fitzgerald, but The Road isn’t exactly the facile fast food sizzler of Love Story or Celestine Prophecy ilk, despite the fact that it’s being hawked at Oprah’s Book Club, right beneath a chastely voluptuous (but yummy) “Bras of Summer” banner ad.

Despite a million little pieces of egg on her face, a flyover the big O’s site reveals titles like As I Lay Dying, A Hundred Years of Solitude and Anna Karenina. Her O’ness seems almost self-consciously intent on steering her tube fed demographic toward big L literature. Years from now, inquiring minds may yet debate whether The Road deserves such a capital letter—whether it was oracular or just apocryphal goth. But it deserves whatever attention it gets, then or now, because The Road has grit.

I must confess I hadn’t know Cormac McCarthy’s work very well. I haven’t even google-imaged him yet because I’m savoring my precognitions. I want to see how my image of him jibes with the real deal. With celebrities, I find the reality mostly pales measured next to my preconceptions. I want a ruddy-headed, freckled David Caruso meets Charles Bukowski type. Craggy face. Pockmarks. A drinker's nose. Except that the title All the Pretty Horses is a bit of a discordant note. Kinda fem, more suited to a Dominique or an Emilie than a Cormac. I start all my journeys on the most superficial of terms. What do I know?

Ok, curiosity got the better of me. The last link didn’t exist before I wrote the previous sentence. And now I’m a little disappointed. The romanticized Charles Joseph McCarthy Jr. is replaced with a www reality thumbnail. He looks a bit more clipped and buttoned down than I thought he would. Ex-USAF. He still doesn’t look like a “pretty horses” kinda guy, but it still makes sense. He makes sense. I understand his protagonist’s relationship with his son in this ghostly, monochromatic world they’re passing through. The dying man lives for only one thing. Love for the boy. The kind of love that kills without blinking to protect him. The kind of love that would die, with a song in its heart, rather than see the child hurt. It’s a fierce, joyful animal thing. It starts when you see them pulled out of their momma and placed before you on the warming table. It hasn’t diminished an iota in all these years. Twenty-first century life is overstuffed, supersized. It’s easy for the love between a father and a son to get lost in all the chromatic distractions of a life with so many choices.

With the first gray light he rose and left the boy sleeping and walked out to the road and squatted and studied the country to the south. Barren, silent, godless. He thought the month was October but he wasn’t sure. He hadn’t kept a calendar for years. They were moving south. There'd be no surviving another winter here.

When it was light enough to use the binoculars he glassed the valley below. Everything paling away into the murk. The soft ash blowing in loose swirls over the blacktop. He studied what he could see. The segments of road down there among the dead trees. Looking for anything of color. Any movement. Any trace of standing smoke. He lowered the glasses and pulled down the cotton mask from his face and wiped his nose on the back of his wrist and then glassed the country again. Then he just sat there holding the binoculars and watching the ashen daylight congeal over the land. He knew only that the child was his warrant. He said: If he is not the word of God God never spoke.

In pre-apocalyptic America, young men without models (from literature or real life) of how to be a man, turn to mass media and encounter two polar and equally loathsome caricatures—the neo-Neanderthal, misogynist, hip hop blingmeister and the emasculated, marginalized, post-modern milquetoast failure. Both leave one with the cheesy slide from masculinity to machismo to misomania. Alas in the 21st Century our spears have been beaten into laptops. Our questions of survival are more existential than literal. Men are still going off to the woods, beating on drums and trying to reconstitute their masculinity through metaphors. Masculinity’s virtues seem virtually, but not entirely extinct. Without actually going to war, we get precious few chances to be warriors. Save in the loving of our children. Cormac and I are together on that.

Wilson snipes at the scientific credibility of McCarthy’s post-apocalyptic limbo. The Inquirer critic calls The Road “just the latest installment in the pornography of despair.” Possibly, because I’m reading it to a 13 year old, the phrase hit me with the impact of a slab of raw liver to the puss.

Master Weiss: What are we reading tonight, Dad?
Mister Weiss: I thought we’d indulge in some more of that pornography of despair, son.
Master Weiss: Gosh dad, aren’t I a little young for that?
Mister Weiss: No son, once you get acclimated to the harder stuff, you realize that Tolkien, Rowling, Twain, Lewis, Lessing, Lem and all the rest of the ones we’ve read over the years are just pantywaists and poofters. No more soft-core depression or Hollywood endings for you me bucko. Time to break out the Vonnegut. `My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings: Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair!'
Master Weiss: Dad, your rant is cutting into my read time.
Mister Weiss: Okay.

Wilson utterly misses the point. Veracity, color and hope don’t live in landscapes, favorable outcomes or even in language, but in the relationship. Let’s pray it doesn’t take a cataclysm to make either the point or the men of my generation willing and holy warriors for our children. If we can’t do that, then we are not men. Happy 13th Birthday, B.
-@V@-

Tuesday, May 8, 2007

Notes on Brecht's Galileo and the Schism Between Science and Popular Culture

Philadelphia's innovative Wilma Theater is currently running a successful and critically acclaimed version of Berthold Brecht's classic Galileo. As somebody who has made a living interpreting the writings of scientists and technologists for wider audiences, I can attest that the divide this play illuminates is great. We children of the "Space Race" might tend to dismiss this as a contemporary phenomenon, the product of a science illiterate, short attention span society. Galileo affirms that the enmity is both longstanding and near intractable. I did see and in fact participated in creating the video design for an ambitious experimental production of the play by the Villanova players about 18 years ago. My younger brother, who was doing masters work there at the time was cast as the Furious Monk. Little did we know that the slow mill of the Church in the guise of Pope JP II would grind out an apology three hundred years in the making, a scant three years later. But it didn’t take long for the spin doctors to recast Galileo’s falling out with the Church as one of the scientist’s personal hubris rather than of repression of scientific inquiry and freedom of thought. Galileo was censured, not because he was right, but because he had the temerity to insist that he was right. Right?

If you're casting about for modern Galileos though, you needn't look any further than the discipline of climatology. It makes you wonder what tools of intimidation the 21st Century Church of Capitalism used to compel the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) scientists to tone down/remove some of their more dire, graphic and perhaps most compelling global warming projections from their recent report. I heard a little blurb about it on the BBC about a month ago, then stone cold silence since. I’d like to see what they left off the May 2007 report. Why isn’t the public clamoring for the unexpurgated version? Maybe they even know where the bees are.

Even Edge.com which I’ve subscribed to for about a year doesn't have a lot about the subject, but do check out neurobiologist William Calvin’s short take on this unreported story, a piece of which I quote here:

Our ancestors lived through a lot of these abrupt climate changes, and some humans will survive the next one. It's our civilization that likely won't, just because the whiplashes happen so quickly that warfare over plummeting resources leaves a downsized world where everyone hates their neighbors for good reason.


Disturbed by the immorality and injustice of our current military adventurism? Just you wait. The future wars for water and food will make our dirty little “oil war” an Audie Murphy cakewalk in comparison.

In exactly this vein, my 13 year old son and I watched Children of Men together, arguably one of the most brilliant films I’ve seen in a decade, a film which greater thinkers than I take as allegory for nature’s revenge for the assault of humans. My B said that he wished I hadn’t showed it to him, that it was the scariest film he’d ever seen and that he found it deeply disturbing. His response saddened me. I’ve never felt more ashamed for our generation, the first generation that knows the score and still chooses to ignore it. Kurt Vonnegut (RIP) said it even better:

"We probably could have saved ourselves, but we were too damned lazy to try very hard ... and too damn cheap."

Is anything human going to be around in 300 years to issue a papal apologia for this generation’s collective crystal sphere orthodoxy? Will there be anybody to apologize to?

I recently had to write mini-bio video scripts for Apollo astronauts Neil Armstrong and John Young. Young, the modest mouse of the bunch, despite being punished for whistle blowing after the Challenger disaster, stumps tirelessly for NASA, for enhanced funding, because among other things he believes that when our ecosystem comes crashing down around our ears, that we’ll be looking to the rocket men and women to bail our asses outta here. He has continually stumped for NASA to "redo the risk statistics for civilization extinction events and get the word out on what we must do to save the human race over the short or long haul." He characterizes his vision as real science by the people, for the people.

Likely that future apologia will have to come long distance, from space stations or a terraformed Mars. To which my wise, beautiful boy queried, that if we screw this beautiful planet up, do we really deserve another chance? I was far too depressed to answer him but we are taking him and his brother out to Glacier National Park this summer while the glaciers are still there. We owe them at least that much and so much more.

There’s a damned good reason we muzzle our scientists. They’re far scarier than the most apocalyptic artists and writers. Add to which, they’re even harder to understand and just plain downers. And lord knows they’re bad for business. So it goes.

yours in words and ideas

-@v@-